Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhance(lti): add new LTI service #4159

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024
Merged

enhance(lti): add new LTI service #4159

merged 13 commits into from
Aug 10, 2024

Conversation

rschlaefli
Copy link
Member

@rschlaefli rschlaefli commented Aug 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced GitHub Actions workflows for automated Docker image builds in both production and QA environments.
    • Created a new Dockerfile for the lti-service application to enhance build efficiency and security.
    • Implemented a new LTI provider setup to facilitate secure user authentication and interaction with external platforms.
    • Added a new service configuration for a MongoDB database in the docker-compose.yml file.
    • Established a new configuration for the @klicker-uzh/lti-service package.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated dotenv package across several projects to the latest version, potentially fixing related issues.
  • Chores

    • Introduced Kubernetes resources for managing LTI configurations, including ConfigMap and Secret.
    • Added new configuration sections in Helm charts for LTI service settings.
  • Documentation

    • Updated package.json files to reflect new dependencies and configurations for various applications.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rschlaefli has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1dcf669 and ca87f8c.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This update enhances the lti-service application with new GitHub Actions workflows for production and QA, streamlined Docker configurations, and updates to the dotenv package across various components. Additionally, new Kubernetes resources, a MongoDB service, and a refined package setup are introduced, significantly improving the application's deployment and operational capabilities.

Changes

File/Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/v3_lti-service-prod.yml New workflow for building and deploying Docker images in production.
.github/workflows/v3_lti-service-qa.yml New workflow for building and pushing Docker images in a QA environment.
apps/lti/package.json New package declaration for @klicker-uzh/lti-service, version 3.1.2-rc.2.
apps/*/package.json Updated dotenv package from 16.0.3 to 16.4.5 across multiple applications.
apps/lti/Dockerfile New multi-stage Dockerfile for the lti-service application.
apps/lti/src/index.ts New implementation of LTI provider setup using ltijs library.
deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/cm-lti.yaml New ConfigMap for LTI configurations in Helm chart.
deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/deployment-app.yaml New Kubernetes Deployment configuration for the LTI application.
deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/secret-lti.yaml New Kubernetes Secret for sensitive LTI configuration data.
deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/values.yaml New section for LTI service configurations in Helm chart values.
docker-compose.yml New MongoDB service configuration for the lti_db database.

Poem

🐇 In fields of code, we hop with glee,
New workflows bloom, like flowers, free.
Docker and LTI, together they play,
Enhancing our service in every way.
With secrets and settings, we dance and prance,
Celebrating changes, let’s take a chance! 🌼✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rschlaefli rschlaefli marked this pull request as ready for review August 10, 2024 09:46
Copy link

gitguardian bot commented Aug 10, 2024

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
GitGuardian id GitGuardian status Secret Commit Filename
1509424 Triggered Generic Password 9242737 docker-compose.yml View secret
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
  1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code.
  2. Replace and store your secret safely. Learn here the best practices.
  3. Revoke and rotate this secret.
  4. If possible, rewrite git history. Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data.

To avoid such incidents in the future consider


🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/lti/src/index.ts (1)

1-1: Consider enabling TypeScript checks.

The @ts-nocheck directive disables TypeScript type checking for the entire file. Consider enabling type checks to catch potential type-related issues and improve code quality.

- // @ts-nocheck
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8143620 and 772a4c3.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (19)
  • .github/workflows/v3_lti-service-prod.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/v3_lti-service-qa.yml (1 hunks)
  • apps/backend-docker/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/func-response-processor/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/.dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/.gitignore (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/_ngrok.sh (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
  • deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/cm-lti.yaml (1 hunks)
  • deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/deployment-app.yaml (1 hunks)
  • deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/secret-lti.yaml (1 hunks)
  • deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/values.yaml (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.yml (2 hunks)
  • packages/graphql/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/prisma/package.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • apps/func-incoming-responses/package.json
  • apps/lti/.dockerignore
  • apps/lti/.gitignore
  • apps/lti/_ngrok.sh
  • apps/lti/package.json
  • apps/lti/tsup.config.ts
  • packages/graphql/package.json
  • packages/prisma/package.json
Additional context used
yamllint
deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/secret-lti.yaml

[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''

(syntax)

deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/cm-lti.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'

(syntax)

Additional comments not posted (22)
.github/workflows/v3_lti-service-prod.yml (2)

30-35: Verify Docker login credentials.

Ensure that the GitHub token used for Docker login has the necessary permissions to push images to the registry.


3-9: Ensure correct trigger configuration.

The workflow is triggered on tag pushes and changes to specific paths. Verify that these triggers align with your intended deployment strategy.

apps/func-response-processor/package.json (1)

27-27: Verify compatibility of dotenv update.

The dotenv package has been updated to version 16.4.5. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of your application and does not introduce breaking changes.

Verification successful

The dotenv update to version 16.4.5 is compatible.

The changelog from version 16.0.3 to 16.4.5 does not indicate any breaking changes. The updates are primarily additive, introducing new features and options without removing existing functionality. Therefore, this update should be safe for your application.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility of the updated `dotenv` package.

# Test: Check for breaking changes in the `dotenv` changelog between versions 16.0.3 and 16.4.5.
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/motdotla/dotenv/master/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 '16.0.3'

Length of output: 1384


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the `dotenv` changelog from versions 16.1.0 to 16.4.5.

curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/motdotla/dotenv/master/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 10 -E '16.1.0|16.2.0|16.3.0|16.4.0'

Length of output: 2846

.github/workflows/v3_lti-service-qa.yml (3)

3-17: Ensure correct QA trigger configuration.

The workflow is triggered on branch pushes and pull requests. Verify that these triggers align with your QA strategy.


38-43: Verify Docker login credentials for QA.

Ensure that the GitHub token used for Docker login in the QA workflow has the necessary permissions.


56-56: Review conditional Docker image push logic.

The Docker image is only pushed if the event is not a pull request. Ensure this logic aligns with your QA deployment strategy.

Verification successful

Conditional Docker Image Push Logic Aligns with QA Strategy

The conditional logic to push Docker images only when the event is not a pull request is consistently used across multiple QA workflows. This indicates that it aligns with the QA deployment strategy to avoid deploying unmerged changes.

  • .github/workflows/v3_auth-qa.yml
  • .github/workflows/v3_frontend-control-docker-qa.yml
  • .github/workflows/v3_frontend-manage-docker-qa.yml
  • .github/workflows/v3_frontend-pwa-docker-qa.yml
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify conditional logic for Docker image push.

# Test: Check if the logic aligns with the QA deployment strategy.
echo "Ensure that the logic aligns with the QA deployment strategy."

Length of output: 132


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all YAML files in the .github/workflows directory to gather context about the deployment strategy.
fd --extension yml --search-path .github/workflows

Length of output: 1139


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract contents of QA-related YAML files to understand the deployment strategy.
cat .github/workflows/v3_auth-qa.yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_frontend-control-docker-qa.yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_frontend-manage-docker-qa.yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_frontend-pwa-docker-qa.yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_klickeruzhprod-response-processor(qa).yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_klickeruzhprod-responses(qa).yml
cat .github/workflows/v3_lti-service-qa.yml

Length of output: 7028

apps/backend-docker/package.json (1)

58-58: Verify compatibility with the updated dotenv package.

The dotenv package has been updated from version 16.0.3 to 16.4.5. Ensure that there are no breaking changes affecting how environment variables are loaded and used within the application. Testing the application is recommended to confirm compatibility.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: No compatibility issues with dotenv update

The usage of dotenv with the -r dotenv/config pattern is consistent and standard across the codebase. There are no indications of compatibility issues with version 16.4.5. The update appears to be compatible with the existing usage patterns.

  • apps/lti/package.json: Uses -r dotenv/config in start scripts.
  • apps/backend-docker/package.json: Uses -r dotenv/config in start scripts.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify compatibility with the updated dotenv package.

# Test: Check for breaking changes in the dotenv changelog.
# Note: This requires internet access, which is not available in the current environment.
# Instead, review the changelog at: https://github.com/motdotla/dotenv/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md

# Test: Search for dotenv usage in the codebase. Expect: No issues with loading environment variables.
rg --type js --type ts --type json 'dotenv'

Length of output: 839


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dotenv usage patterns in the codebase to verify compatibility.
# Specifically look for the usage of `-r dotenv/config` in start scripts or any other configuration patterns.
rg --type js --type ts --type json 'dotenv/config'

Length of output: 448


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any comments or documentation in the codebase that might indicate compatibility issues with dotenv.
rg --type js --type ts --type json 'dotenv' -A 5

Length of output: 3322

apps/lti/src/index.ts (2)

3-3: Ensure environment variables are defined.

The application relies heavily on environment variables. Ensure that all required environment variables are defined and properly loaded to avoid runtime errors.


9-22: Review the commented-out database connection code.

The database connection setup using ltijs-sequelize is commented out. Verify if this is intentional for testing purposes or if it needs to be included for the full functionality of the LTI service.

docker-compose.yml (1)

125-135: Verify MongoDB service configuration and integration.

A new MongoDB service lti_db has been added. Ensure that it is correctly configured and integrated into the application. Check the application code for any MongoDB usage and test the database connection.

deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/values.yaml (7)

268-270: Image configuration looks good.

The Docker image repository and pull policy are correctly specified.


272-274: Service specifications are appropriate.

The service type ClusterIP and port 4000 are suitable for the LTI service.


276-280: Ingress settings are correctly configured.

The ingress annotations for body size and certificate management are appropriate.


282-295: Resource management and autoscaling configuration are appropriate.

The specified resource requests, limits, and autoscaling parameters are reasonable and well-configured.


297-301: Node affinity and tolerations are ready for future customization.

The inclusion of empty nodeSelector, tolerations, and affinity fields allows for future customization.


251-259: Verify sensitive configuration values.

Ensure that sensitive configuration values such as clientId, redirectURL, cookieDomain, and encryptionKey are securely managed and not exposed in the codebase.

Verification successful

Sensitive configuration values are securely managed.

The configuration values for clientId, redirectURL, cookieDomain, and encryptionKey are placeholders in values.yaml and are not hardcoded. They are designed to be provided at deployment time, ensuring that sensitive data is not exposed in the codebase.

  • deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/values.yaml: Contains placeholders for sensitive values.
  • deploy/env-qa-v3/helmfile.yaml and deploy/env-prod-v3/helmfile.yaml: Use environment variables for cookieDomain.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that sensitive configuration values are not exposed in the codebase.

# Test: Search for occurrences of sensitive keys in the codebase. Expect: No hardcoded sensitive values.
rg --type yaml 'clientId|redirectURL|cookieDomain|encryptionKey'

Length of output: 1040


261-266: Ensure secure management of database credentials.

Verify that database credentials (host, port, name, username, password) are stored securely, such as in Kubernetes Secrets, and not hardcoded.

deploy/charts/klicker-uzh-v2/templates/deployment-app.yaml (5)

392-400: Metadata and strategy configuration are correct.

The metadata, including name and labels, and the strategy configuration are well-defined and flexible.


402-408: Replicas and selectors configuration are appropriate.

The replica count and selectors are correctly configured, aligning with autoscaling settings.


410-414: Template metadata and annotations are correctly set.

The annotations for config and secret checksums ensure proper configuration management.


430-457: Container specifications are well-defined.

The container specifications, including security context, image, ports, and environment variables, are complete and secure.


459-469: Node affinity and tolerations are ready for future customization.

The inclusion of empty nodeSelector, tolerations, and affinity fields allows for future customization.

apiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: {{ include "chart.fullname" . }}-secret-lti
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix syntax error in Secret metadata.

The yamllint error indicates a syntax issue at line 4. Ensure that the templating syntax is correct and that the include function is properly used.

-  name: {{ include "chart.fullname" . }}-secret-lti
+  name: "{{ include \"chart.fullname\" . }}-secret-lti"
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
name: {{ include "chart.fullname" . }}-secret-lti
name: "{{ include \"chart.fullname\" . }}-secret-lti"
Tools
yamllint

[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''

(syntax)

Comment on lines 10 to 12
env:
REGISTRY: ghcr.io
IMAGE_NAME: ${{ github.repository }}/lti-service
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider parameterizing the registry and image name.

While the registry and image name are defined as environment variables, consider using repository or organization secrets for better security and flexibility.

env:
  REGISTRY: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY || 'ghcr.io' }}
  IMAGE_NAME: ${{ secrets.IMAGE_NAME || github.repository }}/lti-service

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
{{- $fullName := include "chart.fullname" . -}}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix syntax error in ConfigMap template.

The yamllint error indicates a syntax issue at line 1. Ensure that the templating syntax is correct and that the include function is properly used.

-{{- $fullName := include "chart.fullname" . -}}
+{{ $fullName := include "chart.fullname" . }}
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
{{- $fullName := include "chart.fullname" . -}}
{{ $fullName := include "chart.fullname" . }}
Tools
yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'

(syntax)


EXPOSE 4000

CMD npm start
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider specifying a non-root user for running the application.

Running applications as a non-root user enhances security. Ensure that the npm start command is executed by the nodejs user.

- CMD npm start
+ CMD ["npm", "start"]

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

WORKDIR /app

RUN apk add --no-cache libc6-compat
RUN apk update
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove redundant apk update command.

The apk update command is unnecessary since --no-cache is used with apk add. This can be removed to streamline the build process.

- RUN apk update
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
RUN apk update

WORKDIR /app

RUN apk add --no-cache libc6-compat
RUN apk update
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove redundant apk update command.

The apk update command is unnecessary since --no-cache is used with apk add. This can be removed to streamline the build process.

- RUN apk update
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
RUN apk update

Comment on lines +430 to +457
- name: lti
securityContext:
{{- toYaml .Values.lti.securityContext | nindent 12 }}
image: "{{ .Values.lti.image.repository }}:{{ .Values.lti.image.tag | default .Chart.AppVersion }}"
imagePullPolicy: {{ .Values.lti.image.pullPolicy }}
ports:
- name: http
containerPort: 4000
protocol: TCP
env:
- name: NODE_ENV
value: production
envFrom:
- configMapRef:
name: {{ include "chart.fullname" . }}-config-lti
- secretRef:
name: {{ include "chart.fullname" . }}-secret-lti
# TODO: add liveness and readiness probes to container
# livenessProbe:
# httpGet:
# path: /healthz
# port: http
# initialDelaySeconds: 600
# readinessProbe:
# httpGet:
# path: /healthz
# port: http
resources:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Address the TODO for liveness and readiness probes.

Consider implementing liveness and readiness probes to monitor container health.

Would you like assistance in defining these probes or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 772a4c3 and f9bc2e2.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/v3_lti-prod.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/v3_lti-qa.yml (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/package.json (1 hunks)
  • apps/lti/src/index.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • apps/lti/Dockerfile
  • apps/lti/package.json
  • apps/lti/src/index.ts
Additional comments not posted (10)
.github/workflows/v3_lti-prod.yml (5)

3-9: Trigger configuration looks good.

The workflow is appropriately triggered on pushes to version tags and relevant paths, aligning with best practices for production builds.


10-13: Environment variable setup is appropriate.

Using environment variables for the registry and image name improves maintainability and clarity.


14-20: Job configuration is standard and appropriate.

The job runs on ubuntu-latest with necessary permissions set, which is suitable for Docker build and push operations.


21-29: Environment setup steps are necessary and well-implemented.

Checking out the repository and setting up QEMU and Docker Buildx are crucial for building multi-platform Docker images.


30-50: Docker steps are well-structured. Verify Dockerfile path.

The steps for logging into the registry, extracting metadata, and building and pushing the Docker image are well-structured. Ensure that the Dockerfile path apps/lti/Dockerfile is correct.

Verification successful

Dockerfile path is correct.

The Dockerfile exists at the specified path ./apps/lti/Dockerfile, confirming the workflow configuration is correct. No further action is needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the Dockerfile at the specified path.

# Test: Check if the Dockerfile exists. Expect: The file should exist.
fd -H 'Dockerfile' --exec echo 'Dockerfile found at: {}' || echo 'Dockerfile not found'

Length of output: 486

.github/workflows/v3_lti-qa.yml (5)

3-17: Trigger configuration is suitable for QA.

The workflow is triggered on pushes to specific branches and paths, as well as pull requests, which is appropriate for a QA environment.


18-21: Environment variable setup is consistent and appropriate.

Using environment variables for the registry and image name is consistent with the production workflow and aids maintainability.


22-28: Job configuration is standard and appropriate.

The job runs on ubuntu-latest with necessary permissions set, mirroring the production workflow.


29-37: Environment setup steps are necessary and well-implemented.

Checking out the repository and setting up QEMU and Docker Buildx are crucial for building multi-platform Docker images, consistent with the production workflow.


38-58: Docker steps are well-structured. Verify Dockerfile path.

The steps for logging into the registry, extracting metadata, and conditionally building and pushing the Docker image are well-structured. The conditional push for pull requests is a good practice. Ensure that the Dockerfile path apps/lti/Dockerfile is correct.

Verification successful

Dockerfile path is correct.

The Dockerfile path apps/lti/Dockerfile specified in the GitHub Actions workflow is correct and exists in the repository. No issues found with the Dockerfile path configuration.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the Dockerfile at the specified path.

# Test: Check if the Dockerfile exists. Expect: The file should exist.
fd -H 'Dockerfile' --exec echo 'Dockerfile found at: {}' || echo 'Dockerfile not found'

Length of output: 486

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9bc2e2 and 1dcf669.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/lti/package.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
apps/lti/package.json

[error] 37-37: Expected a property but instead found '}'.

Expected a property here.

(parse)

Additional comments not posted (7)
apps/lti/package.json (7)

1-4: Package metadata looks good.

The package name, version, and license are correctly defined.


5-10: Ensure the module type and main entry point are correct.

The package is defined as a module with the entry point set to dist/index.js. Ensure that this aligns with your build output.


11-14: Dependencies are well-defined.

The dependencies include cross-env and ltijs, which are appropriate for environment configuration and LTI integration, respectively.


15-22: DevDependencies are appropriate for development.

The devDependencies include TypeScript, nodemon, and other tools that support development and testing.


23-36: Review the scripts section for completeness and correctness.

The scripts cover build, development, testing, and formatting tasks. Ensure all scripts are tested and function as expected.


38-40: Node engine version is specified.

The engines field specifies Node version 20. Ensure your environment supports this version.


41-43: Volta configuration extends the root package.json.

This configuration ensures consistency in tooling versions across the project.

"format": "prettier --write .",
"format:check": "prettier --check .",
"start": "node --env-file=.env dist/index.js",
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the trailing comma in the scripts section.

The static analysis tool flagged an issue with a trailing comma. This should be removed to comply with JSON syntax.

-    "start": "node --env-file=.env dist/index.js",
+    "start": "node --env-file=.env dist/index.js"

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Tools
Biome

[error] 37-37: Expected a property but instead found '}'.

Expected a property here.

(parse)

@rschlaefli rschlaefli changed the title enhance(lti): add initial code for new LTI service enhance(lti): add code for new LTI service Aug 10, 2024
@rschlaefli rschlaefli enabled auto-merge August 10, 2024 11:37
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
3 Security Hotspots
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint

Copy link

cypress bot commented Aug 10, 2024



Test summary

38 0 0 0Flakiness 0


Run details

Project klicker-uzh
Status Passed
Commit 64419a9 ℹ️
Started Aug 10, 2024 11:42 AM
Ended Aug 10, 2024 11:49 AM
Duration 06:58 💡
OS Linux Ubuntu -
Browser Electron 118

View run in Cypress Cloud ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Cloud

@rschlaefli rschlaefli disabled auto-merge August 10, 2024 11:50
@rschlaefli rschlaefli changed the title enhance(lti): add code for new LTI service enhance(lti): add new LTI service Aug 10, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 68.493%. remained the same
when pulling ca87f8c on LTI
into 8143620 on v3.

@rschlaefli rschlaefli merged commit 2e70bc9 into v3 Aug 10, 2024
12 of 15 checks passed
@rschlaefli rschlaefli deleted the LTI branch August 10, 2024 11:52
Copy link

cypress bot commented Aug 10, 2024



Test summary

38 0 0 0Flakiness 1


Run details

Project klicker-uzh
Status Passed
Commit 2e70bc9
Started Aug 10, 2024 12:00 PM
Ended Aug 10, 2024 12:07 PM
Duration 07:27 💡
OS Linux Ubuntu -
Browser Electron 118

View run in Cypress Cloud ➡️


Flakiness

cypress/e2e/F-live-quiz-workflow.cy.ts Flakiness
1 Different live-quiz workflows > creates a live quiz without questions and tests the feedback mechanisms and deletes the completed live session

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Cloud

memory: 500Mi

autoscaling:
enabled: true
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is autoscaling enabled on purpose here, and does it react quickly enough to handle a suddenly increased demand in LTI requests? What happens, if the service is not able to react sufficiently quickly during a surge in demand - are requests dropped and the automated login to OLAT fails?

Copy link
Member

@sjschlapbach sjschlapbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice to have LTI available for the automated OLAT login through a separate service! 🤩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants