feat: add simple group chat to allow communication in random groups #4271
Conversation
Current Aviator status
This PR was merged manually (without Aviator). Merging manually can negatively impact the performance of the queue. Consider using Aviator next time.
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rschlaefli has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new messaging feature within group contexts, allowing users to send and view messages in groups. This includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetCourseOverviewData.graphql (1)
96-106: Newmessagesfield aligns with PR objectives and follows best practices.The addition of the
messagesfield to theparticipantGroupsquery aligns well with the PR objective of adding a simple group chat feature. The structure of the new field follows GraphQL best practices and includes all necessary information for displaying messages:
- The
idfield allows for unique identification of messages.- The
contentfield stores the actual message text.- The
participantobject provides details about the message sender.- The
createdAtandupdatedAttimestamps allow for proper message ordering and editing information.However, consider the following points:
Performance: Fetching messages along with other course data might impact query performance, especially for courses with a large number of messages. Consider implementing pagination for messages if not already planned.
Security: Ensure that proper authorization checks are in place on the server-side to prevent unauthorized access to messages.
Real-time updates: For a chat feature, you might want to consider implementing subscriptions for real-time message updates in the future.
packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma (4)
52-52: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
messagesfield to the Participant model is correct and aligns with the PR objective. It establishes a one-to-many relationship between Participant and GroupMessage, allowing participants to have multiple messages.Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this field, for example:
/// Messages sent by the participant in group chats messages GroupMessage[]
71-71: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
messagesfield to the ParticipantGroup model is correct and aligns with the PR objective. It establishes a one-to-many relationship between ParticipantGroup and GroupMessage, allowing groups to have multiple messages.Consider adding a brief comment to explain the purpose of this field, for example:
/// Messages sent in this group chat messages GroupMessage[]
84-97: LGTM! Consider some minor enhancements.The new GroupMessage model is well-structured and aligns with the PR objective. It correctly establishes relationships with ParticipantGroup and Participant, includes appropriate fields, and uses good practices like including timestamps.
Consider the following enhancements:
Add a comment describing the model's purpose:
/// Represents a message sent in a group chat model GroupMessage {Consider adding a maximum length constraint to the
contentfield to prevent excessively long messages:content String @db.VarChar(1000)For consistency with other models, consider using a UUID for the
idfield:id String @id @default(uuid()) @db.UuidThese suggestions are optional and depend on your specific requirements and conventions.
52-52: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objective.The additions to the Prisma schema effectively implement the group chat functionality:
- The Participant model now has a relationship with GroupMessage, allowing participants to have multiple messages.
- The ParticipantGroup model also has a relationship with GroupMessage, enabling groups to contain multiple messages.
- The new GroupMessage model is well-structured and correctly relates to both Participant and ParticipantGroup.
These changes provide a solid foundation for implementing group chat functionality in the application. The relationships are correctly defined, and the necessary fields are included in the GroupMessage model.
As you proceed with implementing the group chat feature, consider the following:
- Implement appropriate access controls to ensure that only group members can read and send messages in their respective groups.
- Consider adding a field for message status (e.g., sent, delivered, read) if real-time messaging features are planned.
- Think about how you'll handle message pagination and loading of historical messages, especially for long-running or high-volume group chats.
- Plan for potential future features like message editing or deletion, which might require additional fields or models.
Also applies to: 71-71, 84-97
apps/frontend-pwa/src/components/groupActivity/GroupActivityList.tsx (2)
35-35: Margin adjustment: Consider the visual impactThe margin-top of the group activities container has been reduced from
mt-8tomt-4. This change will decrease the vertical spacing above the group activities section.While this change is minor, it's important to consider:
- The visual hierarchy and spacing consistency across the application.
- Whether this adjustment aligns with the design system or UI guidelines.
- If this change was intentional or accidental.
To ensure this change is intentional and consistent:
- Verify with the design team if this spacing adjustment is in line with the overall design.
- Check other similar components to maintain consistency in spacing.
- If this change is part of a larger redesign, consider documenting it in the PR description for better context.
Line range hint
1-186: Consider refactoring for improved maintainabilityWhile reviewing the entire component, I noticed some areas that could be improved for better maintainability and readability:
The component contains repeated conditional logic for rendering different activity states. Consider extracting these into separate components or utility functions to reduce complexity and improve readability.
Status indicators use inline styles. It might be beneficial to move these to separate CSS classes for easier maintenance and consistency.
There's no visible error handling or loading state management in this component. Consider adding these to improve user experience during data fetching or when errors occur.
Here's a high-level suggestion for refactoring:
- Extract the activity status rendering logic into a separate component:
const ActivityStatus = ({ activity, instance }) => { if (dayjs().isAfter(activity.scheduledStartAt) && dayjs().isBefore(activity.scheduledEndAt)) { // Render in-progress status } else if (dayjs().isAfter(activity.scheduledEndAt)) { // Render completed status } // ... other conditions }
- Use CSS classes instead of inline styles for status indicators:
<div className={`status-indicator ${isPassed ? 'passed' : 'failed'}`}> <FontAwesomeIcon icon={isPassed ? faCheck : faXmark} /> <div>{t(isPassed ? 'shared.generic.passed' : 'shared.generic.failed')}</div> </div>
- Add error handling and loading states:
if (isLoading) return <LoadingSpinner /> if (error) return <ErrorMessage error={error} />These changes would significantly improve the component's maintainability and readability.
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (1)
Line range hint
624-976: Consider additional features for robust group messagingThe implementation of group messaging is solid and well-integrated. However, consider the following enhancements for a more robust system:
Pagination: For groups with many messages, implement pagination to improve performance. This could be done by adding
first,after,last, andbeforearguments to themessagesfield inParticipantGroup.Message status: Consider adding a
statusfield toGroupMessageto handle read receipts or message delivery status.Message editing and deletion: If these features are planned, consider adding
editMessageanddeleteMessagemutations, and anisDeletedfield toGroupMessage.Example implementation for pagination:
type ParticipantGroup { # ... other fields messages(first: Int, after: String, last: Int, before: String): GroupMessageConnection! } type GroupMessageConnection { edges: [GroupMessageEdge!]! pageInfo: PageInfo! } type GroupMessageEdge { node: GroupMessage! cursor: String! } type PageInfo { hasNextPage: Boolean! hasPreviousPage: Boolean! startCursor: String endCursor: String }These suggestions aim to enhance scalability and provide a more feature-rich group messaging experience.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (1)
294-304: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The implementation of
addMessageToGrouplooks good. It's properly authenticated for participants, takes appropriate arguments, and delegates to the GroupService.Consider adding error handling in the resolver. For example:
resolve(_, args, ctx) { - return GroupService.addMessageToGroup(args, ctx) + try { + return GroupService.addMessageToGroup(args, ctx) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error adding message to group:', error) + return null + } }This will ensure that any errors are logged and the mutation returns null instead of throwing an unhandled exception.
packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts (1)
1970-2015: LGTM: Well-structured message addition function with room for minor improvementThe
addMessageToGroupfunction is well-implemented, including necessary checks for group existence and user participation before adding a message. This aligns with the PR objective of adding group chat functionality.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a length check for the
contentparameter to ensure messages aren't empty or excessively long. For example:if ( !group.participants.some((participant) => participant.id === ctx.user.sub) ) { return null } + // Check message content length + if (content.trim().length === 0 || content.length > 1000) { + return null + } // create a new message const message = await ctx.prisma.groupMessage.create({ // ... (rest of the function) })This would prevent empty messages and set a reasonable maximum length for messages.
packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1)
65-67: Consider maintaining alphabetical orderWhile the new
groupMessagesentry is correctly placed in thegenericsection, consider moving it to maintain alphabetical order with the surrounding entries. This would improve readability and make it easier to locate specific entries in the future.Here's a suggested reordering:
generic: { - groupMessages: 'Group Messages', preferred: 'preferred', + groupMessages: 'Group Messages', groupSize: 'Group Size', courseDuration: 'Course Duration',packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (2)
66-66: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for context.The addition of 'groupMessages' with the translation 'Gruppennachrichten' is correct and well-placed within the 'generic' section. This will allow for consistent usage of the term "group messages" across the application.
For improved maintainability, consider adding a comment above this line to provide context about where and how this translation is used in the application. For example:
+ // Used in the group chat feature groupMessages: 'Gruppennachrichten',This practice can help other developers understand the purpose and usage of this translation key.
Line range hint
1-1984: Overall structure and consistency look good.The file maintains a consistent structure throughout, with clear organization of translations into relevant sections (e.g., 'shared', 'auth', 'pwa', 'manage', etc.). This organization facilitates easy navigation and maintenance of the translations.
To further improve the file's maintainability:
- Consider adding section comments to clearly delineate major sections within the file.
- Ensure all translation keys follow a consistent naming convention (which seems to be camelCase in this file).
- For very long sections, consider splitting them into separate files to improve readability and ease of maintenance.
Example of section comment:
export default { // ===== Shared translations ===== shared: { // ... existing translations ... }, // ===== Authentication related translations ===== auth: { // ... existing translations ... }, // ... other sections ... }These suggestions are minor and can be implemented in future refactoring efforts if deemed necessary.
packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (2)
6738-6836: LGTM! Consider adding a description for theGroupMessagetype.The
GroupMessagetype is well-defined with all necessary fields. Good job on using non-null types for required fields and proper object types forgroupandparticipant.Consider adding a description for the
GroupMessagetype to improve schema documentation. For example:{ "kind": "OBJECT", "name": "GroupMessage", - "description": null, + "description": "Represents a message sent within a group chat", "fields": [ // ... existing fields ],
8018-8062: LGTM! Consider using Int for groupId if appropriate.The
addMessageToGroupmutation is well-defined with proper arguments and return type.If
groupIdis meant to be an integer, consider changing its type from String to Int for consistency with theGroupMessage.idfield:{ "name": "groupId", "description": null, "type": { "kind": "NON_NULL", "name": null, "ofType": { "kind": "SCALAR", - "name": "String", + "name": "Int", "ofType": null } }, "defaultValue": null, "isDeprecated": false, "deprecationReason": null }apps/frontend-pwa/src/components/course/GroupView.tsx (2)
189-199: Suggestion: Reset form after message submissionAfter a message is submitted, the content of the textarea remains. It's better user experience to reset the form so that the textarea is cleared after submitting the message.
Modify the
onSubmitfunction to reset the form:-onSubmit={async (values) => { +onSubmit={async (values, { resetForm }) => { await addMessageToGroup({ variables: { groupId: group.id, content: values.content }, refetchQueries: [ { query: GetCourseOverviewDataDocument, variables: { courseId }, }, ], }) + resetForm() }}
209-214: Suggestion: Disable the submit button while submittingTo prevent duplicate submissions and indicate to the user that the form is processing, it's good practice to disable the submit button while the form is submitting.
Modify the
Buttoncomponent to disable it when the form is submitting:<Button type="submit" className={{ root: 'mt-2' }} data={{ cy: 'group-message-submit' }} + disabled={isSubmitting} > {t('shared.generic.send')} </Button>Ensure you destructure
isSubmittingfrom Formik's render props:<Formik> {({ isSubmitting, ...otherProps }) => ( <Form> {/* ... */} </Form> )} </Formik>packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (1)
1697-1697: Review the nullability of themessagesfield inParticipantGroupThe
messagesfield is defined asmessages?: Maybe<Array<GroupMessage>>;. If the intention is thatmessagesshould always be an array (possibly empty), consider making it non-nullable to simplify client-side handling.Apply this diff if appropriate:
- messages?: Maybe<Array<GroupMessage>>; + messages: Array<GroupMessage>;
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (17)
- apps/frontend-pwa/src/components/course/GroupView.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/frontend-pwa/src/components/groupActivity/GroupActivityList.tsx (1 hunks)
- cypress/cypress/e2e/K-group-activity-workflow.cy.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/MAddMessageToGroup.graphql (1 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/graphql/ops/QGetCourseOverviewData.graphql (1 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/ops.schema.json (3 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (8 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (2 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (3 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/public/server.json (2 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/schema/participant.ts (3 hunks)
- packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/i18n/messages/de.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (1 hunks)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20240922195658_group_messages/migration.sql (1 hunks)
- packages/prisma/src/prisma/schema/participant.prisma (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (11)
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20240922195658_group_messages/migration.sql (2)
13-17: Reconsider CASCADE on DELETE for participant foreign keyThe foreign key constraints are well-defined, but there's a potential issue with the CASCADE on DELETE for the participant foreign key.
Currently, if a participant is deleted, all their messages in all groups will be deleted. This might lead to loss of important conversation context. Consider if it would be better to keep the messages but mark them as from a deleted user.
You could modify the constraint to use SET NULL instead of CASCADE:
-ALTER TABLE "GroupMessage" ADD CONSTRAINT "GroupMessage_participantId_fkey" FOREIGN KEY ("participantId") REFERENCES "Participant"("id") ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE; +ALTER TABLE "GroupMessage" ADD CONSTRAINT "GroupMessage_participantId_fkey" FOREIGN KEY ("participantId") REFERENCES "Participant"("id") ON DELETE SET NULL ON UPDATE CASCADE;However, this would require making the
participantIdcolumn nullable:- "participantId" UUID NOT NULL, + "participantId" UUID,Please verify the intended behavior for message retention when a participant is deleted.
1-17: Overall, good structure with room for improvementThe migration file successfully creates the
GroupMessagetable with appropriate columns and constraints. However, consider the following points:
- Add a default value and automatic update mechanism for the
updatedAtcolumn.- Reconsider the CASCADE on DELETE for the participant foreign key, as it might lead to unintended data loss.
These changes will improve the robustness of your data model and ensure better data retention. It's crucial to align these decisions with your application's requirements and data retention policies.
packages/graphql/src/public/client.json (1)
5-5: LGTM! Changes align with the new group chat feature.The addition of "AddMessageToGroup" and the update to "GetCourseOverviewData" are consistent with implementing a simple group chat feature. These changes appear correct and necessary for the new functionality.
However, it's important to ensure that the changes to "GetCourseOverviewData" don't introduce any breaking changes for existing clients. Please verify that all consumers of this query are updated accordingly.
Also applies to: 112-112
packages/graphql/src/public/schema.graphql (3)
624-631: NewGroupMessagetype looks goodThe
GroupMessagetype is well-defined with appropriate fields:
content: Stores the message content (String).createdAtandupdatedAt: Timestamps for message creation and updates (Date type).id: Unique identifier for the message (Int).group: Reference to the associatedParticipantGroup.participant: Reference to theParticipantwho sent the message.This structure allows for efficient querying and provides all necessary information for group messaging functionality.
733-733: NewaddMessageToGroupmutation is correctly definedThe
addMessageToGroupmutation is properly added to the schema:
- It takes two required arguments:
content(String) andgroupId(String).- It returns a
GroupMessagetype, which is consistent with the newly added type.This mutation will allow clients to add new messages to a specific group.
976-976: UpdatedParticipantGrouptype includes messages fieldThe
ParticipantGrouptype has been correctly updated to include amessagesfield:
- The field is an array of
GroupMessageobjects, allowing for multiple messages per group.- The
!indicates that the array itself is non-nullable, which is a good practice for collections.This change enables querying of messages within a participant group context.
packages/graphql/src/schema/mutation.ts (1)
294-304: Summary: New mutation added successfullyThe addition of the
addMessageToGroupmutation enhances the functionality of the GraphQL API by allowing participants to add messages to groups. This change is well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure.To ensure the new functionality works as expected:
These checks will help confirm that the necessary supporting code is in place for the new mutation.
Verification successful
Re-verification Needed: Correct TypeScript File Identification
The initial verification script failed to recognize TypeScript files due to incorrect type specification. Updated search criteria are necessary to accurately locate and verify the integration of the
addMessageToGroupmutation.These updated commands use file extension patterns (
*.ts) to accurately identify TypeScript files, ensuring effective verification of the mutation integration and theGroupMessagetype definition.
Re-verification Needed: Corrected Regex Patterns for Mutation Integration
The previous verification attempt failed due to an invalid regex pattern. Updated search commands with properly escaped characters are necessary to accurately verify the integration of the
addMessageToGroupmutation and the definition of theGroupMessagetype.These corrected commands escape the parenthesis in the
addMessageToGroup\(pattern, ensuring that the search is parsed correctly and effectively locates the desired code segments.
Further Verification Required: Locate
GroupServiceandGroupMessageDefinitionsThe previous verification attempts failed due to incorrect directory paths and missing type definitions. To accurately verify the integration of the
addMessageToGroupmutation and the existence of theGroupMessagetype, a comprehensive search across the repository is necessary.These commands perform a recursive search for the
GroupServiceclass, theaddMessageToGroupmethod within anyGroupServiceclass, and theGroupMessagetype definition across all TypeScript files in the repository. This approach ensures that the verification process is thorough and not limited by incorrect or outdated directory paths.
Verification Successful: Mutation Integration Confirmed
The
addMessageToGroupmethod is properly implemented within theGroupService, and theGroupMessagetype is correctly defined. The new mutation integrates seamlessly with the existing codebase, ensuring enhanced functionality of the GraphQL API.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the integration of the new mutation # Check if the GroupService has the corresponding method rg --type typescript "addMessageToGroup.*=.*async.*\(.*\).*=>" packages/backend/src/services # Check if the GroupMessage type is properly defined rg --type typescript "type GroupMessage =" packages/graphql/src/schemaLength of output: 237
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the integration of the new mutation by searching for the GroupService method rg --glob '*.ts' "addMessageToGroup(" packages/backend/src/services # Verify if the GroupMessage type is properly defined rg --glob '*.ts' "type GroupMessage =" packages/graphql/src/schemaLength of output: 225
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the integration of the new mutation by searching for the GroupService method rg --glob '*.ts' "addMessageToGroup\(" packages/backend/src/services # Verify if the GroupMessage type is properly defined rg --glob '*.ts' "type GroupMessage =" packages/graphql/src/schemaLength of output: 209
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the GroupService class definition across the entire codebase rg --glob '*.ts' 'class GroupService' . # Search for the addMessageToGroup method within any GroupService class rg --glob '*.ts' 'addMessageToGroup\(' . # Search for the GroupMessage type definition across the entire codebase rg --glob '*.ts' 'type GroupMessage =' .Length of output: 370
packages/graphql/src/services/groups.ts (1)
870-877: LGTM: Enhanced group data retrieval to include messagesThe changes to the
getParticipantGroupsfunction now include messages for each group, ordered by creation time (most recent first), and include participant information for each message. This enhancement aligns well with the PR objective of adding a simple group chat feature.packages/i18n/messages/en.ts (2)
66-66: New translation entry added for group messagesThe addition of the
groupMessagestranslation key is consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions in the file. This new entry will allow for localization of the "Group Messages" feature in the English version of the application.
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall, the changes and existing content look goodThe addition of the
groupMessagestranslation entry is appropriate and consistent with the rest of the file. The file structure, formatting, and content appear to be well-maintained and comprehensive, covering various aspects of the KlickerUZH application.packages/graphql/src/ops.ts (1)
3291-3291: Handle potential null values ofmessagesin queriesIn the
GetCourseOverviewDataQuery, ensure that themessagesfield withinparticipantGroupsis properly handled in the client code, especially if it can benullorundefined.Run the following script to find usages of
messagesand check for proper null handling:
packages/prisma/src/prisma/migrations/20240922195658_group_messages/migration.sql
Show resolved
Hide resolved
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
GroupChat
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 09m 38s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Roland Schläfli |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
3
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
44
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
v3
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 09m 32s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Roland Schläfli |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
|
Failures
|
0
|
|
Flaky
|
2
|
|
Pending
|
0
|
|
Skipped
|
0
|
|
Passing
|
44
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
No description provided.