enhance(packages/graphql): store correctness along open answers in live quiz results #4360
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 Biomepackages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts[error] 110-110: Avoid the use of spread ( Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread) [error] 120-120: Avoid the use of spread ( Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread) [error] 130-130: Avoid the use of spread ( Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread) [error] 210-210: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression. Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator. (lint/complexity/noUselessTernary) [error] 205-205: Avoid the use of spread ( Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread) 🔇 Additional comments (1)packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts (1)
Optimize accumulator usage in reduce function to improve performance When updating Apply this refactor: -return {
- ...responses_acc,
- [responseHash]:
- typeof grading !== 'undefined'
- ? {
- ...updatedResponse,
- correct: grading === 1 ? true : false,
- }
- : updatedResponse,
-}
+if (typeof grading !== 'undefined') {
+ responses_acc[responseHash] = {
+ ...updatedResponse,
+ correct: grading === 1,
+ }
+} else {
+ responses_acc[responseHash] = updatedResponse
+}
+return responses_acc
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts (1)
210-210: Simplify boolean assignment by removing unnecessary ternary operatorThe expression
grading === 1 ? true : falsecan be simplified tograding === 1for clarity and brevity.Apply this change:
-correct: grading === 1 ? true : false, +correct: grading === 1,🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 210-210: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🛑 Comments failed to post (4)
packages/graphql/src/services/liveQuizzes.ts (4)
130-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize accumulator usage in reduce function to improve performance
Again, to enhance performance, avoid spreading the accumulator
accwithin the.reducefunction. Directly update the accumulator instead.Apply this refactor:
-case 2: - return { - ...acc, - [instance.id]: { - ...acc[instance.id], - responses: cacheObj, - }, - } +case 2: + if (!acc[instance.id]) { + acc[instance.id] = {} + } + acc[instance.id].responses = cacheObj + return acc📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!acc[instance.id]) { acc[instance.id] = {} } acc[instance.id].responses = cacheObj return acc🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 130-130: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
172-174:
⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
solutionsis defined before parsing to prevent runtime errors
acc[instance.id]?.['info']?.solutionsmight beundefined, which would causeJSON.parseto throw an error. Add a check to ensure the value exists before parsing.Apply this fix:
-const solutions = JSON.parse( - acc[instance.id]?.['info']?.solutions -) +const solutionsString = acc[instance.id]?.['info']?.solutions +const solutions = solutionsString ? JSON.parse(solutionsString) : []📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const solutionsString = acc[instance.id]?.['info']?.solutions const solutions = solutionsString ? JSON.parse(solutionsString) : []
110-115: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize accumulator usage in reduce function to improve performance
Using the spread operator (
...) on the accumulatoraccwithin the.reducefunction can lead to increased time complexity (O(n²)). Instead, consider mutating the accumulator directly to enhance performance.Apply this refactor:
-case 0: - return { - ...acc, - [instance.id]: { - ...acc[instance.id], - info: cacheObj, - }, - } +case 0: + if (!acc[instance.id]) { + acc[instance.id] = {} + } + acc[instance.id].info = cacheObj + return acc📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!acc[instance.id]) { acc[instance.id] = {} } acc[instance.id].info = cacheObj return acc🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 110-110: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
120-125: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize accumulator usage in reduce function to improve performance
Similar to the previous case, avoid using the spread operator on the accumulator
accwithin the.reducefunction. Mutate the accumulator directly to prevent performance degradation.Apply this refactor:
-case 1: - return { - ...acc, - [instance.id]: { - ...acc[instance.id], - responseHashes: cacheObj, - }, - } +case 1: + if (!acc[instance.id]) { + acc[instance.id] = {} + } + acc[instance.id].responseHashes = cacheObj + return accCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 120-120: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
klicker-uzh
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
klicker-uzh
|
| Branch Review |
store-correctness-results
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 11m 15s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Julius Schlapbach |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
140
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor