WIP Revival of Munit 225 #1
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 5 commits
April 15, 2022 07:05
Previously, FailException had some custom nice-to-have features that ComparisonFailException didn't have.
Previously, MUnit had a subtyping constraint on `assertEquals(a, b)` so that it would fail to compile if `a` was not a subtype of `b`. This was a suboptimal solution because the compile error messages could become cryptic in some cases. Additionally, this API didn't integrate with other libaries like Cats that has its own `cats.Eq[A,B]` type-class. Now, MUnit uses a new `munit.Compare[A,B]` type-class for comparing values of different types. By default, MUnit provides a "universal" instance that permits comparison between all types and uses the built-in `==` method. Users can optionally enable "strict equality" by adding the compiler option `"-Xmacro-settings.munit.strictEquality"` in Scala 2. In Scala 3, we use the `Eql[A, B]` type-classes instead to determine type equality.
This is a fourth attempt at improving strict equality in MUnit `assertEquals()` assertions. * First attempt (current release version): require second argument to be a supertype of the first argument. This has the flaw that the compile error message is cryptic and that the ordering of the arguments affects compilation. * Second attempt: use `Eql[A, B]` in Scala 3 and allow comparing any types in Scala 2. This has the flaw that it's a regression in some cases for Scala 2 users and that `Eql[A, B]` is not really usable in its current form, see related discussion https://contributors.scala-lang.org/t/should-multiversal-equality-provide-default-eql-instances/4574 * Third attempt: implement "strict equality" for Scala 2 with a macro and `Eql[T, T]` in Scala. This improves the situation for Scala 2, but would mean relying on a feature that we can't easily port to Scala 3. * Fourth attempt (this commit): improve the first attempt (current release) by allowing `Compare[A, B]` as long as `A <:< B` OR `B <:< A`. This is possible thanks to an observation by Gabriele Petronella that it's possible to layer the implicits to avoid diverging implicit search. The benefit of the fourth approach is that it works the same way for Scala 3 and Scala 3. It's very nice that we can avoid macros as well.
The Scala 3 (dotty) tests now use compareSubtypeWithSupertype instead of compareSupertypeWithSubtype. Additionally, the "unrelated" test was not seeing the context code above and so I've moved all the code into compileErrors.
|
Closing in favour of scalameta#521 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
scalameta#225
Things to not forget:
This PR is mostly a freshly rebased version of scalameta#225.
It is absolutely worth reviewing the discussion in the original PR. However, I've copy and pasted its description here:
Binary Incompatibility
This PR introduces a binary breaking changes to the following methods:
munit.Assertions.assertNotEqualsmunit.Assertions.assertEqualsmunit.FunSuite.assertNotEqualsmunit.FunSuite.assertEqualsRebasing notes:
The rebase got a little hairy. During it I ditched special casing for array comparisons, so 1503667 reintroduces it. Similarly, b28073f reintroduces the better string inequality error messages.