feat: add class manipulation via functions #12
+835
−1,322
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR allows is a bit more complex but I think the changes will allow much more flexibility. Classes passed via props do not override the classes from variants by default anymore. If you pass
undefined
it will still clear the variant classes but for other values it will merge them. However, now you can also pass a function to the class object which allows you to manipulate the previous classes:P.S.: the
hasProperty
function might lead to some type issues at the moment because it merges the object withRecord<Y, unknown>
and in caseY
is a genericstring
it will basically extend all properties with& unknown
.