-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Develop a soak test for the Vrl Bytecode VM #9832
Labels
type: task
Generic non-code related tasks
Comments
Blocked pending #9818. |
Lading config:
|
blt
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 1, 2021
This commit introduces a new soak that does not output, intending to test only VRL performance. This is in service to the VRL performance work being done by @StephenWakely. Closes #9831 Closes #9832 REF #9515 Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us>
blt
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2021
This commit introduces a new soak that does not output, intending to test only VRL performance. This is in service to the VRL performance work being done by @StephenWakely. Closes #9831 Closes #9832 REF #9515 Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us>
blt
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2021
* Introduce new datadog-agent -> vrl -> blackhole soak This commit introduces a new soak that does not output, intending to test only VRL performance. This is in service to the VRL performance work being done by @StephenWakely. Closes #9831 Closes #9832 REF #9515 Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * add soak to workflow Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * adjust naming scheme Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * update with master Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * removing del because it's not well supported Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us>
lucperkins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2021
* Introduce new datadog-agent -> vrl -> blackhole soak This commit introduces a new soak that does not output, intending to test only VRL performance. This is in service to the VRL performance work being done by @StephenWakely. Closes #9831 Closes #9832 REF #9515 Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * add soak to workflow Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * adjust naming scheme Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * update with master Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us> * removing del because it's not well supported Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian@troutwine.us>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Ref #9515
It would be highly useful to have some accurate benchmarks for the work in #9829 so we can ascertain how much of a benefit moving Vrl to compile and run with a Bytecode VM.
A useful config to test with would be:
SHA to test against: 9d6108d
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: