Skip to content

refactor(turbo-tasks): Derive NonLocalValue by default in value/value_trait macros #48483

refactor(turbo-tasks): Derive NonLocalValue by default in value/value_trait macros

refactor(turbo-tasks): Derive NonLocalValue by default in value/value_trait macros #48483

Triggered via pull request December 10, 2024 23:15
Status Failure
Total duration 13m 23s
Artifacts 9

build_and_test.yml

on: pull_request
Determine changes
10s
Determine changes
build-next  /  build
34s
build-next / build
optimize-ci  /  Graphite CI Optimizer
2s
optimize-ci / Graphite CI Optimizer
validate-docs-links
12s
validate-docs-links
Matrix: test unit
rustdoc check  /  build
2m 4s
rustdoc check / build
ast-grep lint
11s
ast-grep lint
test next-swc wasm  /  build
test next-swc wasm / build
test cargo benches  /  Test
test cargo benches / Test
test next-swc wasi  /  build
test next-swc wasi / build
test devlow package  /  build
test devlow package / build
Matrix: test prod
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test dev
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test integration
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: Test new tests for flakes (dev)
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: Test new tests for flakes (prod)
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test ppr dev
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test ppr prod
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test turbopack dev
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test turbopack development integration
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test turbopack production integration
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: test turbopack production
Waiting for pending jobs
test ppr integration  /  build
test ppr integration / build
test firefox and safari  /  build
test firefox and safari / build
types and precompiled  /  build
1m 3s
types and precompiled / build
Matrix: Run devlow benchmarks
Waiting for pending jobs
Matrix: Test new tests when deployed
Waiting for pending jobs
report test results to datadog
33s
report test results to datadog
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

6 errors, 14 warnings, and 10 notices
rust check / build
@next/swc#rust-check-clippy: command (/root/actions-runner/_work/next.js/next.js/packages/next-swc) /root/actions-runner/_work/_tool/node/20.9.0/x64/bin/pnpm run rust-check-clippy exited (101)
rust check / build: crates/next-core/src/next_client_reference/visit_client_reference.rs#L79
very complex type used. Consider factoring parts into `type` definitions
rust check / build
could not compile `next-core` (lib test) due to 1 previous error
rust check / build
could not compile `next-core` (lib) due to 1 previous error
rust check / build
Process completed with exit code 101.
thank you, next
Process completed with exit code 1.
optimize-ci / Graphite CI Optimizer
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
Determine changes
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
validate-docs-links
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
ast-grep lint
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
rustdoc check / build: crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L953
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::Start`
rustdoc check / build: crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L953
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::End`
rustdoc check / build: crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L953
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::End`
rustdoc check / build: crates/napi/src/next_api/project.rs#L953
public documentation for `project_update_info_subscribe` links to private item `UpdateMessage::Start`
report test results to datadog
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
thank you, next
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/reference/mod.rs#L184
Calling `RawModule::new(*source).to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/rebase.rs#L55
Calling `RebasedAsset::new(*module, *self.input_dir, *self.output_dir)
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/code_builder.rs#L167
Calling `encoded.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-css/src/chunk/mod.rs#L271
Calling `chunk_item_key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-css/src/chunk/mod.rs#L453
Calling `entry_module_key().to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/introspect/utils.rs#L77
Calling `key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/introspect/utils.rs#L95
Calling `key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/introspect/utils.rs#L105
Calling `key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-core/src/introspect/utils.rs#L127
Calling `key.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.
to-resolved-in-loop: turbopack/crates/turbopack-swc-utils/src/emitter.rs#L32
Calling `issue.to_resolved().await?` in a loop could be a doing a lot of work sequentially. Consider producing an iterator of futures and using `try_join`.

Artifacts

Produced during runtime
Name Size
test-reports-test-unit-18
131 KB
test-reports-test-unit-20
130 KB
turbo-run-summary-build-native
101 KB
turbo-run-summary-build-next
137 KB
turbo-run-summary-lint
238 KB
turbo-run-summary-test-cargo-unit
137 KB
turbo-run-summary-test-unit-18
238 KB
turbo-run-summary-test-unit-20
238 KB
turbo-run-summary-types-and-precompiled
238 KB