-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
turbopack : module not found: can't resolve crypto --> jsonwebtoken package uses crypto module #64464
Comments
i use jsonwebtoken package in the middleware. i think the turbopack cant work with modules belong to node js environment exclusively |
if anyone wants a workaround, you can use "jose" instead of "jsonwebtoken" npm package |
Hello, I'm using crypto directly
Inside the
|
Thanks for the report with a great reproduction! I've opened a fix here: #65171. |
## What? Ensures just importing `crypto` does not error, only when it is used it shows an error in the edge runtime. This matches webpack behavior. The `crypto` module was missing the list of unsupported packages in the Next.js Turbopack integration. Fixes #64464 Fixes PACK-2954 ## TODO While adding tests for this issue I found another bug that only happens with webpack. Specifically these 4 packages are accidentally being polyfilled even when they're not set up to be polyfilled. i.e. there's no npm package installed for polyfilling them through aliasing or such. Even in that case `punycode`, `process`, `querystring`, and `string_decorder` get polyfilled regardless, this causes the newly added test to fail. Removing the polyfills would be potentially breaking so we'll want to change it in Next.js 15 instead. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-3252
Verified the reproduction correctly compiles on |
now works properly. thanks |
Thanks for confirming! |
This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for 2 weeks. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you. |
Ensures just importing `crypto` does not error, only when it is used it shows an error in the edge runtime. This matches webpack behavior. The `crypto` module was missing the list of unsupported packages in the Next.js Turbopack integration. Fixes #64464 Fixes PACK-2954 While adding tests for this issue I found another bug that only happens with webpack. Specifically these 4 packages are accidentally being polyfilled even when they're not set up to be polyfilled. i.e. there's no npm package installed for polyfilling them through aliasing or such. Even in that case `punycode`, `process`, `querystring`, and `string_decorder` get polyfilled regardless, this causes the newly added test to fail. Removing the polyfills would be potentially breaking so we'll want to change it in Next.js 15 instead. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-3252
## What? Ensures just importing `crypto` does not error, only when it is used it shows an error in the edge runtime. This matches webpack behavior. The `crypto` module was missing the list of unsupported packages in the Next.js Turbopack integration. Fixes #64464 Fixes PACK-2954 ## TODO While adding tests for this issue I found another bug that only happens with webpack. Specifically these 4 packages are accidentally being polyfilled even when they're not set up to be polyfilled. i.e. there's no npm package installed for polyfilling them through aliasing or such. Even in that case `punycode`, `process`, `querystring`, and `string_decorder` get polyfilled regardless, this causes the newly added test to fail. Removing the polyfills would be potentially breaking so we'll want to change it in Next.js 15 instead. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-3252
## What? Ensures just importing `crypto` does not error, only when it is used it shows an error in the edge runtime. This matches webpack behavior. The `crypto` module was missing the list of unsupported packages in the Next.js Turbopack integration. Fixes #64464 Fixes PACK-2954 ## TODO While adding tests for this issue I found another bug that only happens with webpack. Specifically these 4 packages are accidentally being polyfilled even when they're not set up to be polyfilled. i.e. there's no npm package installed for polyfilling them through aliasing or such. Even in that case `punycode`, `process`, `querystring`, and `string_decorder` get polyfilled regardless, this causes the newly added test to fail. Removing the polyfills would be potentially breaking so we'll want to change it in Next.js 15 instead. <!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated. To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that you follow the checklist sections below. Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making: ## For Contributors ### Improving Documentation - Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the PR. - Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows the docs guidelines: https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide ### Adding or Updating Examples - The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md - Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md ### Fixing a bug - Related issues linked using `fixes #number` - Tests added. See: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ### Adding a feature - Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A discussion must be opened, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas) - Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number` - e2e tests added (https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs) - Documentation added - Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not. - Errors have a helpful link attached, see https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md ## For Maintainers - Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to understand the PR) - When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the conclusion - Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues - Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic behind a change ### What? ### Why? ### How? Closes NEXT- Fixes # --> Closes NEXT-3252
Link to the code that reproduces this issue
https://github.com/ehsanrezaeee/test-jwt
To Reproduce
Current vs. Expected behavior
i expected to redirected to a page in my app with middleware logic. however i encounter the following error:
Which area(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)
App Router, Data fetching (gS(S)P, getInitialProps), Middleware / Edge (API routes, runtime)
Which stage(s) are affected? (Select all that apply)
next dev (local), next build (local), next start (local), Other (Deployed)
Additional context
i tested my app with nextjs v14.2.1 latest version
PACK-2954
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: