-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Warn if user is using <title> within the _document.js #4631
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
45a8ede
Warn if user is using <title> within the _document.js
davscro 2e9120d
Warn if user is using <title> within the _document.js
davscro b94fe40
Uses React.Children.toArray because children could be and object.
davscro 44d9b1f
Merge branch 'canary' into canary_original_fork
davscro 4010144
Merge branch 'canary' into canary_original_fork
davscro 74a9f27
Disable title warning in production / compile away the code
davscro 92b6e8b
Merge branch 'canary' into canary_original_fork
davscro File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
# Title not allowed in _document.js | ||
|
||
#### Why This Error Occurred | ||
|
||
Setting `<title>` in `_document.js` is a bad idea, since then it's only server rendered, but we also do client routing. | ||
|
||
#### Possible Ways to Fix It | ||
|
||
Move `<title>` to `_app.js` |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am I missing something or
this.props.children
won't be rendered at all ifNODE_ENV
isproduction
? 😅There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct, this is wrong, and uglify won't remove the block if it's not development. Instead we have to do something like this:
This way uglify will remove the specific block
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just use
React.Children.forEach
to show the warning ? And keep{this.props.children}
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doing 1 loop instead of 2 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But only in
development
🙈There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Random question - is it not better practice also to check process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'production' instead? I thought that it was safer to assume that 'production' would be present in prod. Some people might want warnings to show in 'staging' also for example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes ! That's also how it was implemented 🙂
#5160 (comment)