Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update labels #47904

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023
Merged

chore: update labels #47904

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2023

Conversation

balazsorban44
Copy link
Member

What?

Syncing https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels with the bug report template.

Why?

We've got some OS-related reports so it would be nice to be able to filter on that.

How?

The label description is added as a select option to the template, which then matches one of the labels https://github.com/vercel/next.js/labels

@balazsorban44 balazsorban44 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2023 11:23
@trunk-io
Copy link

trunk-io bot commented Apr 4, 2023

🚫 This pull request was closed and has been removed from the merge queue (details).

@ijjk ijjk added the created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team. label Apr 4, 2023
@@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ body:
- 'SWC minifier (swcMinify: true)'
- 'SWC transpilation'
- 'Turbopack (--turbo)'
- 'TypeScript'
- 'TypeScript (plugin, built-in types)'
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To make the regex trigger less often if an issue description mentions TS.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 9d5a3e8 into canary Apr 4, 2023
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the chore/update-labels branch April 4, 2023 11:30
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants