Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine revalidatePath type argument #61159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

aramikuto
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #61158

If both page and layout are valid values for the type argument of revalidatePath function, and only an empty value is forbidden, this PR updates the documentation to reflect that.

@aramikuto aramikuto requested review from a team as code owners January 25, 2024 16:28
@aramikuto aramikuto requested review from timeyoutakeit and leerob and removed request for a team January 25, 2024 16:28
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Jan 25, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: e971184

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, this is correct that either value is valid for dynamic pages, thanks for the PR!

@ijjk ijjk enabled auto-merge (squash) January 26, 2024 13:28
@ijjk ijjk merged commit 6bc0779 into vercel:canary Jan 26, 2024
29 checks passed
samcx pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
<!-- Thanks for opening a PR! Your contribution is much appreciated.
To make sure your PR is handled as smoothly as possible we request that
you follow the checklist sections below.
Choose the right checklist for the change(s) that you're making:

## For Contributors

### Improving Documentation

- Run `pnpm prettier-fix` to fix formatting issues before opening the
PR.
- Read the Docs Contribution Guide to ensure your contribution follows
the docs guidelines:
https://nextjs.org/docs/community/contribution-guide

### Adding or Updating Examples

- The "examples guidelines" are followed from our contributing doc
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/examples/adding-examples.md
- Make sure the linting passes by running `pnpm build && pnpm lint`. See
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/repository/linting.md

### Fixing a bug

- Related issues linked using `fixes #number`
- Tests added. See:
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md

### Adding a feature

- Implements an existing feature request or RFC. Make sure the feature
request has been accepted for implementation before opening a PR. (A
discussion must be opened, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/new?category=ideas)
- Related issues/discussions are linked using `fixes #number`
- e2e tests added
(https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing/core/testing.md#writing-tests-for-nextjs)
- Documentation added
- Telemetry added. In case of a feature if it's used or not.
- Errors have a helpful link attached, see
https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/contributing.md


## For Maintainers

- Minimal description (aim for explaining to someone not on the team to
understand the PR)
- When linking to a Slack thread, you might want to share details of the
conclusion
- Link both the Linear (Fixes NEXT-xxx) and the GitHub issues
- Add review comments if necessary to explain to the reviewer the logic
behind a change

### What?

### Why?

### How?

Closes NEXT-
Fixes #

-->
#61159 fixed the documentation by removing incorrect information stating
that the type parameter must be set to 'page' when the path contains a
dynamic segment. This PR reflects this change in the warning message,
while confirming that the condition for the warning is already correct.
Additionally, I changed the word "affect" to "effect," assuming it was a
typo. In the documentation, I corrected myself and changed the wording
from "argument is required" to "parameter is required".
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: Fix the required type argument value for revalidatePath for the dynamic segment
2 participants