Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(javascript): fix wrong javascript code in 11-parallel-routes.mdx #71074

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

lumirlumir
Copy link
Contributor

📚 Improving Documentation

Hello, I've fixed an wrong JavaScript code in 11-parallel-routes.mdx.

There's no need to use type declaration in JavaScript code. So I deleted it.

@ijjk ijjk added the Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation. label Oct 10, 2024
@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Oct 10, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: 3c9b769

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Oct 10, 2024

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: eb940b7

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

@ijjk ijjk merged commit 5bd4271 into vercel:canary Oct 10, 2024
38 checks passed
@lumirlumir lumirlumir deleted the docs-typo-11-parallel-routes branch October 11, 2024 03:23
eps1lon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
…x` (#71074)

## 📚 Improving Documentation

Hello, I've fixed an wrong JavaScript code in
[`11-parallel-routes.mdx`](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/routing/parallel-routes).

There's no need to use type declaration in JavaScript code. So I deleted
it.

---------

Co-authored-by: Zack Tanner <1939140+ztanner@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants