Enhancement: Hierarchical System Properties

[Traderjoe95]

Fixes #129

[vietj]

can you document this in the index.adoc file ?

also I think we should change the hierarchical name to rather something that mentions that now qualified names are accepted.

[Traderjoe95]

can you document this in the index.adoc file ?

I added the documentation and also added some assertions to the test cases. The test now asserts that the properties are indeed parsed to a flat object when hierarchical = false, and that the flat properties are still parsed correctly when hierarchical = true

also I think we should change the hierarchical name to rather something that mentions that now qualified names are accepted.

In my opinion, hierarchical explains the purpose of the attrbute pretty well. I'm not sure that something like qualified will be much clearer. However, maybe I just didn't come up with a good name yet. If we change this, it should also be changed on the PropertiesConfigProcessor to preserve consistent naming.

[Traderjoe95]

I see the check is failing, but that doesn't seem to be related with my changes. There's some test failing in the vertx-config-vault module.

[vietj]

ok @Traderjoe95

[vietj]

I will check locally the tests

[vietj]

I fixed the spring config cloud server issues in the CI

[vietj]

the current vault failures are due to https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8266261

[vietj]

can you rebase and force push on latest master ? now tests should pass

[vietj]

ping @Traderjoe95

[Traderjoe95]

Hey, sorry it looks like I accidentally destroyed the history when rebasing. I will try to fix it

[Traderjoe95]

Okay, the commits are back. Do you want me to clean up the history or is the merge commit fine?

[vietj]

@Traderjoe95 if you can squash commits and sign the ECA, it would be great

[Traderjoe95]

Of course, will do.

Regarding the ECA, I already signed it. The failure is related to one of the commits I pulled in from master

[Traderjoe95]

Now the only issue remaining is this. I signed the ECA, but one of the rebased commits is missing.

Plus, I had some failing tests locally, but those didn't have anything in common with my changes. I want to see if it succeeds in the pipeline

[vietj]

can you provide a new PR created from master on which you cherry-pick your commits only ?

[Traderjoe95]

Sure, I will create a new one during the day

[Traderjoe95]

Closed in favor of #135