Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changes to tls-mode from default to prefer and update test cases #152

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

tanvipise
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 17, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@sitingren
Copy link
Member

README should be updated to reflect this change: https://github.com/vertica/vertica-nodejs/tree/master/packages/vertica-nodejs#tls

return self.emit('error', new Error('The server does not support TLS connections'))
if (self.tls_mode == 'prefer') {
self.attachListeners(self.stream)
self.emit('sslconnect')
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the management of our connection state events, 'sslconnect' is the proper event to emit. This may seem odd because we are not actually connecting with SSL wrapped socket in this case, however the sslconnect event just symbolizes that we completed our attempt at an ssl connection.

So this code and this emission of 'sslconnect' is correct. Just wanted to add some context

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
//Should we remove this file as its a redundant test for TLS mode?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is reasonable to move this test for bad credentials to tls-tests.js.

Additionally, I would be partial to not only moving this test into tls-tests.js, but also moving tls-tests.js into mochatest/integration/connection (currently only client directory exists so we would add connection).

This is surely not any sort of requirement for this work so if you would prefer to leave things as they are, that is fine.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can open up another PR later for moving the tests and doing some more cleanup.

Copy link
Collaborator

@DMickens DMickens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me now. I would give @sitingren a chance to take a look as well as she had some initial comments

Copy link
Member

@sitingren sitingren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@tanvipise tanvipise merged commit b823bfe into vertica:master Oct 23, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants