Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert removing clad::array_ref from InterfaceCompatibility.C #929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

PetroZarytskyi
Copy link
Collaborator

clad::array_ref should not have been removed from InterfaceCompatibility.C in #925. The whole point of InterfaceCompatibility.C is to check the compatibility of Clad's interfaces with clad::array_ref.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.08%. Comparing base (1e88e75) to head (c50a9d9).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #929   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.08%   94.08%           
=======================================
  Files          53       53           
  Lines        7762     7762           
=======================================
  Hits         7303     7303           
  Misses        459      459           

Copy link
Owner

@vgvassilev vgvassilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! LGTM!

@vgvassilev vgvassilev merged commit 3cf8b33 into vgvassilev:master Jun 7, 2024
87 checks passed
@PetroZarytskyi PetroZarytskyi deleted the array-ref branch June 10, 2024 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants