Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic S3 support. #14

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2018
Merged

Conversation

eaceaser
Copy link

setting access keys is optional. if they are unset, the implicit credentials from your environment will be used.

Since this came from a downstream repo there's a small chance that my merge was bad, but I double checked and it looked fine.

setting access keys is optional, if they are unset, the implicit
credentials from your environment will be used.

s3:
enabled: false
bucket: "<S3-BUCKET-NAME>"
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not the worlds biggest fan of <THESE-DEFAULT-PLACEHOLDERS> but I don't have a good alternative. I figure that this can be improved in a later pass if it ever is an issue.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed.

@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ deck:
# hosts:
# - domain.com

# Bucket to use when storing config data in S3 compatible storage
storageBucket: spinnaker
Copy link
Author

@eaceaser eaceaser Jul 13, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really see the reason to have a shared root storageBucket key and I think having it separate is less clear, so I denormalized it back into the individual config stanzas, but feel free to disagree with that, as I may be missing some context.

Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense! Thanks for making the change. There was a great reason to have it split out other than the fact that there was only one provider originally and then I co-opted the existing value when I added GCS support.

@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ deck:
# hosts:
# - domain.com

# Bucket to use when storing config data in S3 compatible storage
storageBucket: spinnaker
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes sense! Thanks for making the change. There was a great reason to have it split out other than the fact that there was only one provider originally and then I co-opted the existing value when I added GCS support.


s3:
enabled: false
bucket: "<S3-BUCKET-NAME>"
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed.

@viglesiasce viglesiasce merged commit 9e13f54 into viglesiasce:spin-v1.0.0 Jul 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants