feat: add chokidarOptions to override the default ignored

[4-1-1]

Description

Additional context

---

What is the purpose of this pull request?

• Bug fix
• New Feature
• Documentation update
• Other

Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following

• Read the Contributing Guidelines.
• Read the Pull Request Guidelines and follow the Commit Convention.
• Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
• Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. fixes #123).
• Ideally, include relevant tests that fail without this PR but pass with it.

[Shinigami92]

I'm also missing a description in the PR. Could you explain why this is needed?
Does it resolve an issue?
May we want to merge chokidarOptions and watchOptions to one override object?

[Shinigami92]

Missing type, is there really no typedef exported by chokidar that could be reused?

[patak-dev]

You can use server.watch to pass these options already. Did you find an issue doing so?

[4-1-1]

You can use server.watch to pass these options already. Did you find an issue doing so?

I want to override the ignored option, you can check the code, vite provide a ignored option to chockidar , and can't to be override , I need to watch an package in node_modules. @patak-js

[patak-dev]

Maybe we should replace the default ignored if the user specify one. We should check if this was not done already for a reason

[antfu]

Agree that we should allow users to override when provided.

[4-1-1]

@patak-js @antfu Yes, Maybe check first is better, but it's not compatible

[patak-dev]

What do you mean? Couldnt we check if ignored is present and use that instead of our default?

[4-1-1]

What do you mean? Couldnt we check if ignored is present and use that instead of our default?

If Someone use vitejs , and provide an ignored option before, it will not ignored node_modules and .git .
if you use new option to do lt , they will be always ok @patak-js

[antfu]

Yes, this could be a breaking change. But I guess a pretty minor one that we could possibly fit in 2.7

[4-1-1]

Ok, i'm waiting 🤔

[bluwy]

I suppose this fixes #5023, we should have it on the PR description

[4-1-1]

I suppose this fixes #5023, we should have it on the PR description

yes

[haoqunjiang]

Negated glob patterns have higher priority than positive ones.
So configurations like ignored: ['!**/node_modules/**'] would suffice. Let's document it instead of adding an option.

[4-1-1]

@sodatea

it's not working. Is there a way to disable .vite cache, the package don't update before i remove node_modules/.vite

[haoqunjiang]

@4-1-1 See the example in the corresponding documentation PR: https://github.com/vitejs/vite/pull/5239/files