Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[main] Upgrade the Golang version to go1.20.7 #13682

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2023

This Pull Request bumps the Golang version to go1.20.7 and the bootstrap version to 20.

Do not trust the bot blindly. A thorough code review must be done to ensure all the files have been correctly modified.

There are a few manual steps remaining:

  • Make sure you update the Golang version used in the previous and next release branches for the Upgrade/Downgrade tests.
  • Build and Push the bootstrap images to Docker Hub, the bot cannot handle that.
  • Update the ./.github/workflows/*.yml files with the newer Golang version, the bot cannot handle that due to permissions.
    • To accomplish this, run the following: go run ./go/tools/go-upgrade/go-upgrade.go upgrade workflows --go-to=1.20.7

Signed-off-by: GitHub <noreply@github.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks Component: General Changes throughout the code base labels Aug 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from deepthi as a code owner August 2, 2023 00:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added go Skip CI Skip CI actions from running labels Aug 2, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from mattlord as a code owner August 2, 2023 00:23
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Aug 2, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • If this is a change that users need to know about, please apply the release notes (needs details) label so that merging is blocked unless the summary release notes document is included.
  • If a test is added or modified, there should be a documentation on top of the test to explain what the expected behavior is what the test does.

If a new flag is being introduced:

  • Is it really necessary to add this flag?
  • Flag names should be clear and intuitive (as far as possible)
  • Help text should be descriptive.
  • Flag names should use dashes (-) as word separators rather than underscores (_).

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow should be required, the maintainer team should be notified.

Bug fixes

  • There should be at least one unit or end-to-end test.
  • The Pull Request description should include a link to an issue that describes the bug.

Non-trivial changes

  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.

New/Existing features

  • Should be documented, either by modifying the existing documentation or creating new documentation.
  • New features should have a link to a feature request issue or an RFC that documents the use cases, corner cases and test cases.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from VTop, if used there.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Aug 2, 2023
@frouioui frouioui added this to the v18.0.0 milestone Aug 7, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor Author

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2023

This PR is being marked as stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. To rectify, you may do any of the following:

  • Push additional commits to the associated branch.
  • Remove the stale label.
  • Add a comment indicating why it is not stale.

If no action is taken within 7 days, this PR will be closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. label Sep 7, 2023
@frouioui
Copy link
Member

frouioui commented Sep 7, 2023

Closing this PR as it is a duplicate of #13933

@frouioui frouioui closed this Sep 7, 2023
@frouioui frouioui deleted the upgrade-go-to-1.20.7-on-main branch September 7, 2023 21:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Benchmark me Add label to PR to run benchmarks Component: General Changes throughout the code base go NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says Skip CI Skip CI actions from running Stale Marks PRs as stale after a period of inactivity, which are then closed after a grace period. Type: CI/Build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant