Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release of v17.0.3 #14140

Merged

Conversation

mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

Includes the release notes and release commit for the v17.0.3 release. Once this PR is merged, we will be able to tag v17.0.3 on the merge commit.

Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
@vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Sep 29, 2023

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Sep 29, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v17.0.3 milestone Sep 29, 2023
@mattlord mattlord mentioned this pull request Sep 29, 2023
17 tasks
@mattlord mattlord requested review from systay and removed request for dkhenry, shlomi-noach, derekperkins, ajm188 and rohit-nayak-ps September 29, 2023 15:00
@mattlord mattlord removed NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request labels Sep 29, 2023
mattlord and others added 3 commits September 29, 2023 11:22
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <mattalord@gmail.com>
…create_release-1

Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
Signed-off-by: Florent Poinsard <florent.poinsard@outlook.fr>
@mattlord mattlord merged commit dced85d into vitessio:release-17.0 Oct 3, 2023
110 of 113 checks passed
@mattlord mattlord deleted the release-17.0-create_release-1 branch October 3, 2023 14:25
@mattlord mattlord mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2023
18 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: General Changes throughout the code base Type: Release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants