Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add S3 minimum part size defined by the user #17171
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
add S3 minimum part size defined by the user #17171
Changes from all commits
07aba1c
5c4694b
c4a5988
9ab638a
6a7a622
4ab78e0
364f8f5
0342e4c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This new flag must also be added to vitess-operator there:
https://github.com/planetscale/vitess-operator/blob/6e2323e6d536ac5f7fe6be2256479611ca68d3a1/pkg/operator/vitessbackup/storage_s3.go#L27-L39
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it only needed on that struct so we can load the definitions? in any case we can discuss in planetscale/vitess-operator#645
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if it's worth adding a project dependency on humanize for this and the error message below. The flag is in bytes, so I think it would actually be better to log the bytes here as well to confirm that the expected/flag value is used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it was already an indirect dependency, so I thought I would use it :)
I can remove it tomorrow since the preference is to avoid it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, you're right! Sorry, for some reason I thought we added it to go.mod here. No reason not to use it here then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay, I will leave it then and just update the comment as mentioned below!