Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix filter NotReady node #507

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2019
Merged

Conversation

wangyuqing4
Copy link
Contributor

when openSession get ssn.Node, don't filter notReady node, so calculate totalResource incorrect.

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 4, 2019
@@ -126,6 +128,16 @@ func (ni *NodeInfo) setNodeState(node *v1.Node) {
return
}

var nodeInfo cache.NodeInfo
nodeInfo.SetNode(ni.Node)
if fit, _, _ := predicates.CheckNodeConditionPredicate(nil, nil, &nodeInfo); !fit {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How to work together with TaintNodeByCondition?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wangyuqing4 wangyuqing4 Nov 4, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

now in AddPredicateFn we use func CheckNodeConditionPredicate, if conditions have some type and status, like NodeNetworkUnavailable, true, the pod can't be scheduled.

i move the same func CheckNodeConditionPredicate for node forward. so AddPredicateFn also is incorrect?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@k82cn please help to review :)

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @wangyuqing4,
Your changes look good to me!

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: c03fac70-fea8-11e9-b5b5-d568244b8b3c

@TravisBuddy
Copy link

Hey @wangyuqing4,
Your changes look good to me!

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 9a79d880-0141-11ea-82f1-cf3ba55cf6d0

@k82cn
Copy link
Member

k82cn commented Nov 7, 2019

/lgtm
/approve

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 7, 2019
@volcano-sh-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: k82cn, wangyuqing4

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 7, 2019
@volcano-sh-bot volcano-sh-bot merged commit 95de4ef into volcano-sh:master Nov 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants