Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make dynamic groups work for fo3d files #4527

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sashankaryal
Copy link
Contributor

@sashankaryal sashankaryal commented Jun 24, 2024

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

The app wasn't allowing creation of dynamic groups for fo3d media type. This PR fixes the bug.

Before

image

After

2024-06-24 15 23 59

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved logic for dynamic group handling, leading to better performance and accuracy in group-based features.

@sashankaryal sashankaryal self-assigned this Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The change in the recoil/groups.ts file involves modifying the fo3dSample selector. This modification introduces a condition that incorporates the get(isDynamicGroup) function, altering the control flow based on whether the group is dynamic.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts Introduced a condition to the fo3dSample selector's get function using get(isDynamicGroup), affecting its control flow.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant fo3dSample
    participant isDynamicGroup

    User->>fo3dSample: Access fo3dSample
    fo3dSample->>isDynamicGroup: get(isDynamicGroup)
    alt isDynamicGroup is true
        fo3dSample-->>User: Return modified data for dynamic group
    else isDynamicGroup is false
        fo3dSample-->>User: Return standard data
    end
Loading

Poem

In the code where logic leaps and bounds,
The fo3dSample now profound,
Dynamic groups it did unveil,
A change that flows, like rabbit trails.
With get(isDynamicGroup) in the weave,
Our logic blooms, we now believe.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sashankaryal sashankaryal requested a review from a team June 24, 2024 22:27
@sashankaryal sashankaryal added bug Bug fixes app Issues related to App features labels Jun 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 677467b and ff1034b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

Gitleaks
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts

243-243: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

Additional comments not posted (2)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (2)

455-455: Well-implemented dynamic group handling in fo3dSample.

The updated logic correctly checks the dynamic group status before proceeding, which aligns with the PR's objective to handle fo3d files in dynamic groups. Consider adding a comment explaining why this check is necessary for future maintainability.


Line range hint 243-243: Verify potential security issue flagged by static analysis.

The static analysis tool flagged a potential API key exposure on this line. Please verify if sensitive information is exposed here. If it's a false positive, consider adjusting the static analysis tool's configuration to avoid similar future alerts.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff1034b and 3fa98a9.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

Gitleaks
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts

243-243: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

Additional comments not posted (2)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (2)

455-455: Verify the logic for fo3dSample selector to ensure it aligns with the PR objectives.

The added condition !get(isGroup) || get(isDynamicGroup) in the fo3dSample selector is crucial for the PR's objective to make dynamic groups work for fo3d files. This change should allow dynamic group conditions to correctly influence the behavior of fo3dSample.

However, ensure that this change does not inadvertently affect other media types or selectors that depend on fo3dSample.

Verification successful

Verify the impact of fo3dSample selector change on other media types

The fo3dSample selector is referenced in multiple files:

  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts
  • app/packages/looker-3d/src/fo3d/MediaTypeFo3d.tsx
  • app/packages/looker-3d/src/action-bar/index.tsx

These references are specific to the fo3d media type and do not indicate any unintended effects on other media types.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the change in `fo3dSample` does not affect other media types.
# Test: Search for other selectors that depend on `fo3dSample`. Expect: No other media types affected.
rg --type ts --type tsx $'fo3dSample'

Length of output: 64



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the change in `fo3dSample` does not affect other media types.
# Test: Search for other selectors that depend on `fo3dSample`. Expect: No other media types affected.
rg --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' fo3dSample

Length of output: 525


Line range hint 243-243: Potential security risk detected: Generic API Key exposed.

Static analysis has flagged line 243 as containing a potential generic API key. This could expose sensitive operations and should be reviewed and possibly removed or secured if it's a valid key.

- const groupId = atom<string>({
-   key: "groupId",
-   default: null,
- });
+ // TODO: Verify if the API key is necessary and secure it appropriately

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1)

Line range hint 243-243: Potential security risk: Generic API key detected.

The static analysis tool has flagged a potential generic API key at line 243. This could expose sensitive operations if it's an actual API key. Please verify if this is a placeholder or an actual key, and if it's the latter, rotate it and store it securely.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fa98a9 and 1d010bf.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

Gitleaks
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts

243-243: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

Additional comments not posted (1)
app/packages/state/src/recoil/groups.ts (1)

457-460: Ensure correct handling of isDynamicGroup and hasFo3dSlice.

The logic here correctly checks for the isDynamicGroup and hasFo3dSlice conditions to determine the appropriate sample to return. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enable dynamic groups for fo3d files. However, ensure that the conditions are exhaustively tested to cover edge cases where hasFo3dSlice might be false while isDynamicGroup is true.

Copy link
Contributor

@imanjra imanjra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sashankaryal sashankaryal merged commit 1c80c2e into develop Jun 26, 2024
16 checks passed
@sashankaryal sashankaryal deleted the bugfix/dynamic-groups-3d branch June 26, 2024 04:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
app Issues related to App features bug Bug fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants