Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MODULES-1192 fixes to handle mcollective::actionpolicy::rule 'facts' par... #209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2015

Conversation

duritong
Copy link

...ameter conflicting with $facts hash when trusted_node_data=true

  • add travis matrix builds for puppet 3.7.0, with and without trusted_node_data=true
  • rename mcollective::actionpolicy::rule 'facts' parameter to 'fact_filter', to not conflict with $facts hash from trusted_node_data=true
  • require puppetlabs_spec_helper >= 0.7.0 for TRUSTED_NODE_DATA env variable
  • add actionpolicy::rule spec, along with test for specified facts param
  • update templates/actionpolicy.erb

This is a rebased & fixed PR for #161

…parameter conflicting with $facts hash when trusted_node_data=true

- add travis matrix builds for puppet 3.7.0, with and without trusted_node_data=true
- rename mcollective::actionpolicy::rule 'facts' parameter to 'fact_filter', to not conflict with $facts hash from trusted_node_data=true
- require puppetlabs_spec_helper >= 0.7.0 for TRUSTED_NODE_DATA env variable
- add actionpolicy::rule spec, along with test for specified facts param
- update templates/actionpolicy.erb
@ffrank
Copy link
Contributor

ffrank commented Jun 4, 2015

LGTM, would merge if someone agrees.

igalic added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2015
MODULES-1192 fixes to handle mcollective::actionpolicy::rule 'facts' par...
@igalic igalic merged commit a7dff4d into voxpupuli:master Sep 21, 2015
@igalic
Copy link
Contributor

igalic commented Sep 21, 2015

@duritong, @jantman! thanks a lot.
from what i gather, this will require a major bump?

@duritong
Copy link
Author

Given that we remove facts as parameter (although it never worked correctly): I guess so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants