Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove java dependency from deb #141

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015
Merged

remove java dependency from deb #141

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2015

Conversation

rooty0
Copy link
Contributor

@rooty0 rooty0 commented Oct 15, 2015

So java management was already removed from this module, but we still have a java dependency inside the deb package. As a result deployment can fall in case of custom java deployment.

Example:

Error: /Stage[main]/Rundeck::Install/Exec[install rundeck package]/returns: change from notrun to 0 failed: /usr/bin/dpkg --force-confold -i /tmp/rundeck-2.5.1-1-GA.deb returned 1 instead of one of [0]
# /usr/bin/dpkg --force-confold -i /tmp/rundeck-2.5.1-1-GA.deb
(Reading database ... 92055 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack /tmp/rundeck-2.5.1-1-GA.deb ...
Unpacking rundeck (2.5.1) over (2.5.1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of rundeck:
 rundeck depends on java7-runtime | java7-runtime-headless | java8-runtime | java8-runtime-headless; however:
  Package java7-runtime is not installed.
  Package java7-runtime-headless is not installed.
  Package java8-runtime is not installed.
  Package java8-runtime-headless is not installed.

dpkg: error processing package rundeck (--install):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 rundeck

In the environment above there is example of deployment of java in deb-less way .

liamjbennett pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2015
remove java dependency from deb
@liamjbennett liamjbennett merged commit 5668ff4 into voxpupuli:master Oct 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants