Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue #930 #931

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2019
Merged

fix issue #930 #931

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2019

Conversation

drafish
Copy link
Contributor

@drafish drafish commented Jul 3, 2019

First of all, thank you for your contribution! 😄

New feature please send pull request to feature branch, and rest to master branch.
Pull request will be merged after one of collaborators approve.
Please makes sure that these form are filled before submitting your pull request, thank you!

[中文版模板 / Chinese template]

This is a ...

  • New feature
  • Bug fix
  • Site / document update
  • Component style update
  • TypeScript definition update
  • Refactoring
  • Code style optimization
  • Branch merge
  • Other (about what?)

What's the background?

  1. Describe the source of requirement.
    I want to use getFieldDecorator in jsx
  2. Resolve what problem.
    FormItem render problem when use getFieldDecorator
  3. Related issue link.
    use getFieldDecorator in jsx report an error (TypeError: Cannot read property 'value' of undefined) #930

API Realization (Optional if not new feature)

  1. Basic thought of solution and other optional proposal.
  2. List final API realization and usage sample.
  3. GIF or snapshot should be provided if includes UI/interactive modification.

What's the effect? (Optional if not new feature)

  1. Does this PR affect user? Which part will be affected?
  2. What will say in changelog?
  3. Does this PR contains potential break change or other risk?

Changelog description (Optional if not new feature)

  1. English description
  2. Chinese description (optional)

Self Check before Merge

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • TypeScript definition is updated/provided or not needed
  • Changelog is provided or not needed

Additional Plan? (Optional if not new feature)

If this PR related with other PR or following info. You can type here.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 3, 2019

Deploy preview for ant-desing-vue processing.

Building with commit ae16640

https://app.netlify.com/sites/ant-desing-vue/deploys/5d1ccdf0523cd40009bb4128

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #931 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #931      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.27%   87.25%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         145      145              
  Lines        4817     4818       +1     
  Branches     1421     1422       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         4204     4204              
  Misses        570      570              
- Partials       43       44       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
components/form/FormItem.jsx 87.12% <0%> (-0.44%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3239117...ae16640. Read the comment docs.

@tangjinzhou tangjinzhou merged commit b0c95d3 into vueComponent:master Jul 5, 2019
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 5, 2020

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants