You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pulled this comment out from #69 so we could discuss separately and clarify either way.
Do we intend the aria-description value on an element to be able to be included in its description by a self-reference in the value of aria-describedby?
If so, that does not appear to be supported by the current definition of aria-describedby computation.
If not, we may want to make that constraint more clear. It would make the behavior of aria-describedby slightly different from the behavior of aria-labelledby.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that we should probably not do this type of reference.
I think we want aria-description to be like aria-label ... except mapping to the ACCDESCRIPTION in the API
Pulled this comment out from #69 so we could discuss separately and clarify either way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: