IDL attribute reflection branch #708
Conversation
|
I have now linked my GitHub and W3C accounts, but I do not have privs to revalidate the failing IPR check. |
|
I see a bunch of links that point to the WHATWG HTML spec. Are these pages unavailable in the W3C HTML spec? |
index.html
Outdated
| <tr><td><dfn>ariaLive</dfn></td><td><pref>aria-live</pref></td></tr> | ||
| <tr><td><dfn>ariaModal</dfn></td><td><pref>aria-modal</pref></td></tr> | ||
| <tr><td><dfn>ariaMultiLine</dfn></td><td><pref>aria-multiline</pref></td></tr> | ||
| <tr><td><dfn>ariaMultiSelectable</dfn></td><td><pref>aria-selectable</pref></td></tr> |
|
Zoe, if you post review comments on the specific line, it will be easier to track this down. I found one link (repeated twice) to the Reflection definition. Is this what you meant by "a bunch"? I linked the WHATWG version b/c the W3C spec is frequently out-of-date, but for the purposes of this reference, the W3C version will do. Added commit c424047. |
|
@cookiecrook sorry for not being clearer before—will add line comments next time. My use of “a bunch” was incorrect, just tried to cover my butt in case I missed one 😬. Thanks for fixing it. |
…gs), and DOMTokenLists can't be both reaonly and reflected (token list reflection will be handled differently).
…enList doesn't gain authors much and makes reflection more difficult.
cookiecrook
force-pushed
the
attr-reflection
branch
from
c424047
to
4420d14
Compare
|
Can you clarify why [Reflect] was removed? Is it because the semantics were wrong, or is it because the IDL syntax doesn't officially support reflecting attributes whose property names don't match? |
|
|
|
Thanks. I see now that this more or less matches how other specs are written. [Reflect] isn't part of the official WebIDL spec, so the definition of each attribute explicitly indicates that it reflects a content attribute. |
Closes #691
Preview | Diff