Dcat issue79 datasets (don't merge yet) #613
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 6 commits
November 26, 2018 22:46
|
@dr-shorthair - do you plan that this picks up #81 as well? Or is that what your reference to :"more work to integrate it"? |
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Started to describe dataset-dataset qualified pattern, in parallel with the dataset-agent pattern I already did. As suspected it raised more issues and more work is required to properly integrate it.
Also a question of whether these PROV-O-based extensions belong in the main dcat.ttl graph or should be moved over to the dcat-prov alignment graph.