-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change definition of space-like maction and semantics #160
Comments
This seems reasonable to me |
Consensus from 2019/11/11: Handle maction/semantics the same as other mrow-like ("whose in-flow children are space-like" instead of "whose first in-flow child exists and is space-like") |
@fred-wang: can this be closed due to #182 and #183? |
Tests updated for the new definition web-platform-tests/wpt#21568 (we could add more tests for semantics/maction with more than one child, but I guess that's enough for now). |
Defintion https://mathml-refresh.github.io/mathml-core/#dfn-space-like has the following:
<mrow>
,<mstyle>
,<mphantom>
or<mpadded>
all of whose in-flow children are space-like;<maction>
or<semantics>
element whose first in-flow child exists and is space-like.Test: mathml/presentation-markup/spaces/space-like-002.html
When trying to make maction/semantics behave as mrow in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1588733 ; this test now fails.
Proposal: merge these two items:
<mrow>
,<maction>
,<semantics>
,<mstyle>
,<mphantom>
or<mpadded>
all of whose in-flow children are space-like;Since normally non-visible maction/semantics children are displayed "none", they are effectively out-of-flow and the MathML3 logic is preserved.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: