Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review acknowledgments and editors list #706

Closed
wseltzer opened this issue Dec 5, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Review acknowledgments and editors list #706

wseltzer opened this issue Dec 5, 2017 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wseltzer
Copy link
Member

wseltzer commented Dec 5, 2017

Let's review the acknowledgments to get them in shape for CR.

Shall we alphabetize the list of editors?

@jcjones
Copy link
Contributor

jcjones commented Dec 5, 2017

+1 to alphabetize the editors.

I also would propose we move some of the editors who've not been involved recently to 'former editors'.

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

@levangongPayPal has already told me he's fine with being listed as "contributor".

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added this to the CR milestone Dec 5, 2017
@selfissued
Copy link
Contributor

We should add Akshay as a current editor.

@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Dec 5, 2017

@selfissued @jcjones @equalsJeffH I will make a call for additional editors on next weeks call so we are all in agreement

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

equalsJeffH commented Dec 6, 2017

Summary: In case it is helpful, I've extracted the names/userids of all webauthn committers from the webauthn git repo. Here is the list along with a commit count for each (note: some commits by various folks were to various ancilliary items in the repo, such as README.md, the travis & bikeshed stuff, etc):

> git hist | grep -Fof webauthn-committer-names.txt | sort -f | uniq -c
   1 [Ackermann Yuriy]
   1 [Adam Langley]
   1 [Akshay Kumar]
  16 [Alexei Czeskis]
  26 [Angelo Liao]
  41 [AngeloKai]
  12 [balfanz]
   1 [bifurcation]   (Richard Barnes)
   9 [Christiaan Brand]
   8 [christiaanbrand]
   6 [Dirk Balfanz]
  63 [Emil Lundberg]
   8 [gmandyam]
   4 [Harry Halpin]
  75 [J.C. Jones]
   5 [James 'J.C.' Jones]
   1 [James Barclay]
  41 [=JeffH]
  72 [JeffH]
  22 [Jeffrey Yasskin]
   8 [Johan Verrept]
   2 [kpaulh]
   1 [levangongPayPal]
  32 [Mike Jones]
  44 [Mike West]
   1 [Philip Jägenstedt]
   1 [Rahul Ghosh]
  22 [rlin1]
  11 [Rolf Lindemann]
   1 [Samuel Weiler]
   1 [samweiler]
  46 [Vijay Bharadwaj]
   1 [Wally Jones]
  23 [Wendy Seltzer]
   1 [wseltzer]
   2 [ynojima]

Note: there's also the github webauthn repo "contributors" page: https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/graphs/contributors

tl;dr: I did an initial extraction from the git hist output of any line containing a substring matching "[.*]" using:
git hist | egrep -o "\[.*\]" | sort -f | uniq -ic

..which output all committer names/userids plus various spurious noise since some commit comments have text containing square brackets. I extracted the committer names/userids from that output by hand, and created the webauthn-committer-names.txt file (below), which i subsequently used to produce the above "clean" committer list.

> cat webauthn-committer-names.txt
[=JeffH]
[Ackermann Yuriy]
[Adam Langley]
[Akshay Kumar]
[Alexei Czeskis]
[Angelo Liao]
[AngeloKai]
[balfanz]
[bifurcation]
[Christiaan Brand]
[christiaanbrand]
[Dirk Balfanz]
[Emil Lundberg]
[gmandyam]
[Harry Halpin]
[J.C. Jones]
[James 'J.C.' Jones]
[James Barclay]
[JeffH]
[Jeffrey Yasskin]
[Johan Verrept]
[kpaulh]
[levangongPayPal]
[Mike Jones]
[Mike West]
[Philip Jägenstedt]
[Rahul Ghosh]
[rlin1]
[Rolf Lindemann]
[Samuel Weiler]
[samweiler]
[Vijay Bharadwaj]
[Wally Jones]
[Wendy Seltzer]
[wseltzer]
[ynojima]

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

In terms of acknowledging folks who've provided feedback on the spec and/or submitted issues, I wonder if there is a means to do something similar to the committer info extraction in #706 (comment), and generate a list of names/userids that have submitted issues?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants