Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate rp.name #2159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Deprecate rp.name #2159

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

emlun
Copy link
Member

@emlun emlun commented Sep 27, 2024

Closes #2121.

The following tasks have been completed:

  • [ ] Modified Web platform tests (link) No change to client logic

Implementation commitment:

Documentation and checks

  • [ ] Affects privacy
  • [ ] Affects security
  • [ ] Updated explainer (link

Preview | Diff

@emlun emlun added this to the L3-WD-02 milestone Sep 27, 2024
@emlun emlun self-assigned this Sep 27, 2024
@nadalin nadalin requested review from agl and sbweeden October 2, 2024 19:08
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
- This string MAY contain language and direction metadata. [=[RPS]=] SHOULD consider providing this information. See [[#sctn-strings-langdir]] about how this metadata is encoded.
- This string MAY contain language and direction metadata.
[=[RPS]=] SHOULD consider providing this information if setting the member to a value other than the [=RP ID=].
See [[#sctn-strings-langdir]] about how this metadata is encoded.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't we getting rid of this stuff? Wasn't that the outcome from TPAC?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I figure we're tracking that aspect in #1643, this PR simply preserves what's currently there (but aligns it with the suggested default).

Copy link
Contributor

@sbweeden sbweeden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'm pretty sure most RPs are setting it to the RPID anyway.

@sbweeden
Copy link
Contributor

sbweeden commented Oct 3, 2024

Per discussion on WG call 2024-10-02, merging this as I was asked to be a secondary reviewer and there were no objections to merging after that review.

@sbweeden sbweeden merged commit 1e2256d into main Oct 3, 2024
2 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
SHA: 1e2256d
Reason: push, by sbweeden

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@emlun emlun deleted the issue-2121-rp-name branch October 7, 2024 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deprecate rp.name
4 participants