-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix up several linking mistakes. #336
Conversation
849dd4d
to
f88519d
Compare
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -39,28 +39,22 @@ Markup Shorthands: css off, markdown on | |||
|
|||
<pre class="anchors"> | |||
|
|||
<!-- spec: HTML; urlPrefix: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ --> | |||
spec: HTML51; urlPrefix: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/; for: web | |||
spec: HTML; urlPrefix: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could also switch this to HTML52 and https://w3c.github.io/html/. IMO, it's not quite as good as the WHATWG's version, but it fixes many mistakes in HTML5.1, which will save folks time reading your crosslinks.
2829c06
to
d946ac4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only have one minor question, otherwise the LGTM, thanks @jyasskin :)
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -690,7 +694,7 @@ authorizing an authenticator with which to complete the operation. | |||
}; | |||
</pre> | |||
|
|||
<div dfn-for="Attachment"> | |||
<div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
am curious why this is an unadorned <div>
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No good reason; I just missed that I should remove it once it didn't have a dfn-for
. I've pushed a new commit that removes it. Thanks!
No description provided.