-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix 745: remove self attstn from U2F attstn format #781
Conversation
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -3365,7 +3365,7 @@ This attestation statement format is used with FIDO U2F authenticators using the | |||
:: fido-u2f | |||
|
|||
: Attestation types supported | |||
:: [=Basic Attestation=], [=Self Attestation=], [=Attestation CA=] | |||
:: [=Basic=], [=AttCA=] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is AttCA
a typo? (I see other references to [=Attestation CA=]
in the file, but none to AttCA
.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, perhaps it works in light of this change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah that's why i suggest merging pr #746 before this one, in the OP #781 (comment)
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -3365,7 +3365,7 @@ This attestation statement format is used with FIDO U2F authenticators using the | |||
:: fido-u2f | |||
|
|||
: Attestation types supported | |||
:: [=Basic Attestation=], [=Self Attestation=], [=Attestation CA=] | |||
:: [=Basic=], [=AttCA=] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, perhaps it works in light of this change.
@emlun Please review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good assuming #780 is merged first.
@equalsJeffH Can you merge ? |
fixes #745, related to PR #746 (merge latter before this one)
Preview | Diff