feat: supporting android and ios rp origins

[TomerDavid-Transmit]

While using the lib, I noticed that the rpOrigin, as returned by the android native fido2 client attestation response, is considered invalid.
Made this change for the lib to support android FacetIDs as origins.
In depth explanation: https://fidoalliance.org/specs/uaf-v1.0-id-20141122/fido-appid-and-facets-v1.0-id-20141122.html#the-appid-and-facetid-assertions
Also added support for the iOS FacetID prefix, as specified in the fido2 docs above.
Empirically, our experiments with native iOS clients resulted with https rp origins - so the docs might be outdated, but I added the FacetID support just in case.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (aef3754) 92.95% compared to head (f4af93d) 92.97%.

❗ Current head f4af93d differs from pull request most recent head 6497d56. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6497d56 to get more accurate results

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #121      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.95%   92.97%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        5992     6007      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         5570     5585      +15     
  Misses        422      422              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/toolbox.js	90.46% <100.00%> (+0.40%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[JamesCullum]

Hey @TomerDavid-Transmit thanks for the contribution! Are you trying to achieve the same thing as in #122 ?

[TomerDavid-Transmit]

Hey @TomerDavid-Transmit thanks for the contribution! Are you trying to achieve the same thing as in #122 ?

@JamesCullum yes, except for the prefix I think we should look for. #122 searches android: and ios: as prefixes, and I think we should search for android:apk-key-hash: and ios:bundle-id: for specificity.
was just working on adding the iOS support + tests to this PR

[Rimmassukhovsky]

Very much needed addition!

[gaizeror]

Thanks for this contribution, was waiting for it for a long time!

[HananArgov]

looks like an encompassing code.
good one :)

[Hexagon]

LGTM 👍 This one is slightly more complete than #122

@JamesCullum 3.3.6 or 3.4.0? I think i vote for 3.3.6.

[amoskle]

Nice change!

[JamesCullum]

@Hexagon I think 3.4.0 would make more sense as new feature, as previously we didn't support it.

Will merge and do it - thanks!