Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: Use implementation-defined more #240

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

domfarolino
Copy link
Member

@domfarolino domfarolino commented Sep 23, 2024

Inspired by #239 which mysteriously closed.


Preview | Diff

@domfarolino domfarolino requested a review from domenic September 23, 2024 17:17
@domfarolino domfarolino merged commit 4abe1bc into main Sep 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@domfarolino domfarolino deleted the implementation-defined branch September 23, 2024 18:57
AtkinsSJ added a commit to AtkinsSJ/ladybird that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.
AtkinsSJ added a commit to LadybirdBrowser/ladybird that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.
ebanner pushed a commit to ebanner/ladybird that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.
nico pushed a commit to nico/serenity that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.

(cherry picked from commit 51f82c1d939dd28a3e719d7fa495cf9f30d0921c)
nico pushed a commit to nico/serenity that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.

(cherry picked from commit 51f82c1d939dd28a3e719d7fa495cf9f30d0921c)
nico pushed a commit to SerenityOS/serenity that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2024
whatwg/console#240 is an editorial change to use
the term "implementation-defined" more consistently. This seems to be
the only instance in the spec text which we quote verbatim.

(cherry picked from commit 51f82c1d939dd28a3e719d7fa495cf9f30d0921c)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants