-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 330
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Operate on internal response #23
Comments
The problem is that initially Fetch was a closed system and we'd only add a restriction on response on the way out. Service workers however allow injecting a response half-way in with a restriction in place. So we should probably fix this by making everything aware of a response potentially being a filtered response. On the way out we then need to decide whether to switch filters or not. |
In HTTP Fetch step 2.2 we check request's mode, we could also check request's response tainting. The difference would be that a opaque response to a same-origin (but no-cors) request would not be allowed whereas that is allowed today. Status quo is probably okay. |
So for HTTP Fetch we need to acknowledge there's a response and potentially an internal response. If there's an internal response we want to check the internal response's status, headers, etc. in that algorithm. For fetch step 11 I think we should basically skip responses that already have an internal response (i.e. that are filtered responses). Combined with HTTP Fetch step 2.2 that works fine I think. @nikhilm @jakearchibald @wanderview am I missing anything? |
Are you saying step 11 can be skipped because the response returned from the SW will already be filtered due to SW being able to obtain a filtered response only from fetch() or cache.match(), both of which will 'do the right thing'? That sounds correct. |
Yeah, that was my reasoning. Combined with the fact that we already disallow certain responses from the service worker (e.g. opaque response is not allowed if the request wasn't no-cors). |
So I don't really see how a service worker can end up with a response that's opaque which HTTP fetch would need to worry about. The only opaque responses it can get are at the end of a redirect or authentication chain, no? |
Closing this since I think I'm correct and I fixed the other issue. |
…, but didn't. Fixes #23 again (and better this time).
I should have worried about authentication at least. That works in a no-cors scenario. And soon redirects will be a tad more exposed too. I apparently also missed various cases in what is now "main fetch" but they should all be fixed now. |
# This is the 1st commit message: # This is a combination of 23 commits. # This is the 1st commit message: Integrate CORP and COEP This is part of the introduction of COEP (whatwg/html#5454). The CORP check now takes COEP into account. Also, responses coming from service workers are checked. # This is the commit message #2: Update fetch.bs Co-authored-by: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> # This is the commit message #3: Update fetch.bs Co-authored-by: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> # This is the commit message #4: fix # This is the commit message #5: fix # This is the commit message #6: fix # This is the commit message #7: fix # This is the commit message #8: fix # This is the commit message #9: fix # This is the commit message #10: fix # This is the commit message #11: fix # This is the commit message #12: fix # This is the commit message #13: fix # This is the commit message #14: fix # This is the commit message #15: fix # This is the commit message #16: fix # This is the commit message #17: fix # This is the commit message #18: Update fetch.bs Co-authored-by: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> # This is the commit message #19: Update fetch.bs Co-authored-by: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> # This is the commit message #20: fix # This is the commit message #21: fix # This is the commit message #22: fix # This is the commit message #23: fix # This is the commit message #2: fix
When getting a response back from the service worker, need to operate on internal response.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: