Editorial: link to post message options #5860
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
annevk
approved these changes
Aug 25, 2020
|
I made https://gist.github.com/domenic/d0ea64893c255445574fd535ca89731f at one time. We could throw it into the GitHub wiki? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A variety of specs want to link to PostMessageOptions/transfer. Hopefully this will enable them to do so, while also enhancing our own internal cross-referencing.
(I didn't mark this up with data-export and all the rest of the Bikeshed definition contract, since currently everything is being inferred by the scraper. If we change to be explicit, we should do so as discussed in #5694.)
/web-messaging.html ( diff )
/window-object.html ( diff )
/workers.html ( diff )