This package is still under development and hasnāt yet been extensively tested. Use due diligence when handling sensitive or confidential data.
ādeidentifyrā isnāt on CRAN yet. You can install it from github with ādevtoolsā:
devtools::install_github('wilkox/deidentifyr')
Hereās an example dataset containing some patient data.
There are two variables in this data frame containing personally
identifying information: MRN
and DOB
. We could just remove these
columns and generate a random ID number for each patient, but that would
make it difficult to match the patients if we wanted to merge two data
frames together. The solution is to generate a unique ID code, a
cryptographic hash (SHA-256), from the identifying columns. This type of
hash has two useful properties: it is very unlikely that the same hash
would be generated for two people who have different information; and it
is near impossible to recover the personal information from the hash
(though in certain circumstances it might be very easy; see
Salting, below). For most datasets, using only the first ten
characters of the hash is sufficient to generate unique IDs.
We can generate these unique IDs with the deidentify()
function. The
first argument to deidentify()
is the data frame, and after that we
can list the columns from which to generate the IDs.
library(deidentifyr)
patient_data <- deidentify(patient_data, MRN, DOB)
patient_data
#> id days_in_hospital
#> 1 f58a379a54 94
#> 2 cce440c5bd 22
#> 3 dc670951be 66
#> 4 234f0adeb4 13
#> 5 184cde82b6 27
#> 6 1f2a3527a0 39
#> 7 bce298677f 2
#> 8 41582e0e27 39
#> 9 46e1c69542 87
#> 10 6d93cb09ee 35
The MRN
and DOB
columns have been removed, and replaced with a new
column called id
containing a unique hash for each patient. If you
donāt want to remove the original columns, deidentify()
can be
called with the argument drop = FALSE
. You can also choose a different
name for the ID column with key = "name"
.
The same identifying details will always generate the same hash. This means that a different data frame deidentified in the same way will have the same IDs for each patient.
patient_data2
#> MRN DOB sex
#> 1 33895779 1985-02-20 F
#> 2 43491150 1987-02-20 M
#> 3 61556802 1945-03-02 F
#> 4 91738701 1970-02-24 F
#> 5 28151373 1938-03-04 M
#> 6 90855071 1961-02-26 M
#> 7 95020774 1943-03-03 M
#> 8 69471801 1920-03-08 F
#> 9 66620263 1970-02-24 M
#> 10 15560764 1938-03-04 F
patient_data2 <- deidentify(patient_data2, DOB, MRN)
patient_data2
#> id sex
#> 1 f58a379a54 F
#> 2 cce440c5bd M
#> 3 dc670951be F
#> 4 234f0adeb4 F
#> 5 184cde82b6 M
#> 6 1f2a3527a0 M
#> 7 bce298677f M
#> 8 41582e0e27 F
#> 9 46e1c69542 M
#> 10 6d93cb09ee F
Note that it didnāt matter that we listed the identifying columns in a
different order the second time we called deidentify()
. We can now
match patients between the data frames without needing to reidentify
them.
combined_data <- merge(patient_data, patient_data2, by = "id")
combined_data
#> id days_in_hospital sex
#> 1 184cde82b6 27 M
#> 2 1f2a3527a0 39 M
#> 3 234f0adeb4 13 F
#> 4 41582e0e27 39 F
#> 5 46e1c69542 87 M
#> 6 6d93cb09ee 35 F
#> 7 bce298677f 2 M
#> 8 cce440c5bd 22 M
#> 9 dc670951be 66 F
#> 10 f58a379a54 94 F
In certain circumstances, there is a potential method somebody could use to reidentify the patients. Suppose a bad actor happened to have access to a master list of all the patients who had ever been admitted to the hospital. If they could guess which columns (i.e.Ā which pieces of personally identifying information) you used to create the unique IDs, they could generate IDs from this master list using the same hashing method. They could then compare their IDs to the ones you created, and figure out who each patient is in the deidentified dataset.
A solution to this is to add an extra piece of information to the hash,
which is not personally identifying information about the patients but a
secret known only to you. By adding this extra piece, called a āsaltā,
completely different unique IDs will be generated. You will be able to
regenerate the same IDs from a different dataset if you wanted, by
adding the same salt, so your ability to match patients between
deidentified datasets will not be lost. However, unless the bad actor
manages to discover your secret salt, they will not be able to generate
a list of potential IDs from which to reidentify the patients. You can
add a salt by calling deidentify()
with the extra argument salt = "mysalt"
.
Decisions about using or not using a salt, how to keep the salt a secret, and what personally identifying information to include in the hash will depend on the nature of the dataset and the context in which it will be used. Having access to confidential data, particularly about peopleās health, is a privilege and a responsibility. Take some time to make these decisions carefully.
- anonymizer takes a different approach to the same problem.