-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Export Cloudflare runtime types #5230
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: be1a1e4 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | |||
export type { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! What's the reason for this manual .d.ts
instead of emitting types when building to dist/
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do emit types to dist. But TypeScript doesn't read the exports
field (in certain versions of TypeScript) and so it has to find them at the root like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahhh, right — would it make sense to update the build
script to astro-scripts build \"src/**/*.ts\" && tsc && cp dist/runtime.d.ts runtime.d.ts
and .gitignore
the one in root?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this approach is simpler than depending on a build that could be changed accidentally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought the manual version might be prone to becoming out of date if we change src
and not this file, but if the runtime file won’t change very often maybe that’s fine 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that is a risk. We are doing this the same way in the main astro package. Not sure if there's a good solution.
Changes
Testing
Tested with a project
Docs
N/A