Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove discord as official community channel #3717

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

6543
Copy link
Member

@6543 6543 commented May 22, 2024

as we mostly already stop-ed using discord, we should not encourage to new users

@6543 6543 requested a review from anbraten May 22, 2024 01:34
@woodpecker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

woodpecker-bot commented May 22, 2024

Deployment of preview was torn down

@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

If we do this, we should completely close the discord in the next months. Otherwise I'd say it's fine to still have a link there so users can join if they don't want to use matrix.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented May 23, 2024

well i would first start with just make it unofficial ...

@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, we can start with it and once it's unofficial, it can also stay I'd say.

Then however, please remove the discord announcement from .woodpecker/social.yaml.

@anbraten
Copy link
Member

anbraten commented May 23, 2024

I would just leave the general channel. Seems like some users still use it and help each other, so why should we force them to use matrix.

@pat-s pat-s enabled auto-merge (squash) May 24, 2024 14:29
@pat-s pat-s merged commit b9a37ec into main May 24, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@pat-s pat-s deleted the mk-discord-unofficial branch May 24, 2024 14:33
@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented May 24, 2024

I would just leave the general channel. Seems like some users still use it and help each other, so why should we force them to use matrix.

I think we should not force - the discord server is still able to be discovered via discord and I wont delete the server - e.g. it's now just unofficial but we can & still should have a look at it from time to time

@woodpecker-bot woodpecker-bot mentioned this pull request May 24, 2024
1 task
@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

What about my question?

Then however, please remove the discord announcement from .woodpecker/social.yaml.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented May 25, 2024

I dont see harm in having release notes there ... untill it breaks at that point we can remove it

@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

My point is that as long as we automatically post it there from our pipeline it's an official channel, even if it's not listed in the docs.

@6543
Copy link
Member Author

6543 commented May 25, 2024

ok could you submit a pull to rm it then?

6543 added a commit to 6543-forks/woodpecker that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: Patrick Schratz <patrick.schratz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants