Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump mono to 2019-08@528103728fc2aedb7b6062e11255d39a0ed3f31c to add missing NS2.1 APIs #7147

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2019

Conversation

akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

@akoeplinger akoeplinger commented Oct 1, 2019

See mono/mono#17064.

The 2019-08 version of the fix adds a new assembly with NS2.1 APIs that we stubbed out in 2019-06: System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll

Commit diff: mono/mono@d8441de...5281037

…missing NS2.1 APIs

See mono/mono#17064.

The 2019-08 version of the fix adds a new assembly with NS2.1 APIs that we stubbed out in 2019-06: System.Data.DataSetExtensions.dll
@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member Author

This needs to be ported to all branches that use mono 2019-08.

Copy link
Member

@mandel-macaque mandel-macaque left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@akoeplinger is this brining a new test dll that should be added to the BCL tests? if the is the case, could you create an issue and assign me?

@mandel-macaque
Copy link
Member

mandel-macaque commented Oct 1, 2019

@VincentDondain please do the backport needed for this to be in all 2019-08 related branches since you are the Qbert.

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member Author

@mandel-macaque yes there should be a corresponding test dll.

@VincentDondain
Copy link
Contributor

@monojenkins backport to d16-4

@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Build failure
Build succeeded
API Diff (from stable)
API Diff (from PR only) (no change)
Generator Diff (no change)
🔥 Test run failed 🔥

Test results

12 tests failed, 138 tests passed.

Failed tests

  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 32-bits - simulator/Debug: Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 32-bits - simulator/Debug (LinkSdk): Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 32-bits - simulator/Debug (static registrar): Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 32-bits - simulator/Release (all optimizations): Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 64-bits - simulator/Debug: Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 64-bits - simulator/Debug (LinkSdk): Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 64-bits - simulator/Debug (static registrar): Failed
  • monotouch-test/iOS Unified 64-bits - simulator/Release (all optimizations): Failed
  • monotouch-test/tvOS - simulator/Debug: Failed
  • monotouch-test/tvOS - simulator/Debug (LinkSdk): Failed
  • monotouch-test/tvOS - simulator/Debug (static registrar): Failed
  • monotouch-test/tvOS - simulator/Release (all optimizations): Failed

@dalexsoto
Copy link
Member

Failures are due to [FAIL] UrlProtocolTest.RegistrarTest : DidReceiveData is failing because of user agent sniffing on microsoft.com will be fixed by #7154

@dalexsoto dalexsoto merged commit fb1f73e into xamarin:master Oct 2, 2019
@akoeplinger akoeplinger deleted the add-ns21-apis branch October 2, 2019 12:05
mandel-macaque added a commit to mandel-macaque/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2019
Following PR  xamarin#7147 we
have a new dll and therefore new tests to run.

Fixes: xamarin#7148
mandel-macaque added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2019
Following PR  #7147 we
have a new dll and therefore new tests to run.

Fixes: #7148
monojenkins pushed a commit to monojenkins/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2019
Following PR  xamarin#7147 we
have a new dll and therefore new tests to run.

Fixes: xamarin#7148
mandel-macaque pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2019
Following PR  #7147 we
have a new dll and therefore new tests to run.

Fixes: #7148
@rolfbjarne rolfbjarne added the not-notes-worthy Ignore for release notes label Sep 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
not-notes-worthy Ignore for release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants