Yi Xiong 2020/11/25
-
The Meta DB and the Public DB can both perform well in soil proteomics 😊
-
Meta proteomics analysis pipeline based on Proteome Discovery output 💡
-
Xiong Yi, Zheng Lu, Meng Xiangxiang, et al. Protein sequence databases generated from metagenomics and public database produced similar soil metaproteomic results of microbial taxonomic and functional changes. Pedosphere, 2021 ✌️
- Reproduce this study
mkdir Proteomics
cd Proteomics
git clone https://github.com/xyz1396/Meta-proteomics-analysis-pipeline-based-on-Proteome-Discovery-output
# Run the rmd files in Rstudio
-
data:
- input dataset used in this study (large files like database in fasta and blast XML file are ignorged)
-
figure:
- output pictures used in the paper
-
script:
- rmd files storing the code to analyze the data
-
table:
- output tables used in the paper
-
temp:
- temporary files generated in this study
compare length of identified proteins
Meta DB VolcanoPlot
Correlation of abundance identified by the two databases in LP with histogram
Correlation of KEGG level3 identified by the two databases in HP with histogram
Summary statistics of protein annotations
Enrichment analysis results
The heatmap of abundance of protein identified by the Meta DB
Percentage of identical matches
PSMs of genera identified only by Meta DB and both DB
The amount of proteins with significantly differential abundance identified by the Public DB