Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

RFE: Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions #17

Open
ankostis opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

RFE: Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions #17

ankostis opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@ankostis
Copy link

ankostis commented Sep 29, 2019 •
edited
Loading

An optional argument for some function may be compulsory for another function.
As currently implemented, optional inputs are defined once, and on the data node,
affecting all functions "needing" them (if data-node eventually overwritten, that is).

Diving into the networkx internals, an obvious change would for the optional modifier to translate to an networkx edge-attribute between the function and its need.
@ankostis ankostis changed the title Modifier optional should apply on edges, not nodes Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions Sep 29, 2019
@ankostis ankostis changed the title Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions ENH: Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions Sep 29, 2019
@ankostis ankostis changed the title ENH: Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions RFE: Allow a "need" to function selectively as "optional" on some functions Sep 29, 2019
ankostis added a commit to ankostis/graphtik that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2019
@ankostis
ENH(OPTIONAL): optionals per OPERATION, not to NEEDs...
94b7291 
o
+ Closes yahoo#17
@ankostis ankostis mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2019
Closed
@ankostis
Copy link
Author

ankostis commented Oct 5, 2019

Invalid issue.
Has confused idea how the project worked.
(related though to #22-2.2)

@ankostis ankostis closed this as completed Oct 5, 2019
@ankostis ankostis reopened this Oct 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ankostis