Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do not touch old patterns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for not minding my own business, but it looks like your requested change was implemented by @tmthywynn8 a couple of months ago. I'm not that familiar with the GitHub workflow, but it looks like this is just waiting for your approval.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I made the necessary changes in commit 783d296 and requested another review to make sure that I fulfilled the requirements. I'm not sure what the procedure is suppose to be, so maybe requesting another review was the wrong thing to do
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure yet but I think removing the original pattern (by replacing it with the new pattern) fixed the problem, and putting it back has re-broken it. My suspicion is that both patterns are matched on the page in question but one returns an invalid ID. Or perhaps a valid ID that nevertheless yields an error when the code later tries to retrieve it.
If I'm right, undoing the requested change will get it working again. But that's not really a solution, and again I'm not sure yet.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry it took me so long to get to this, but I just tested #25216 and it works for me as-is. So my theory above is completely wrong.