Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: support for @software bibtex records for citing ASCL codes #42

Closed
kirxkirx opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #43
Closed

Feature request: support for @software bibtex records for citing ASCL codes #42

kirxkirx opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #43
Assignees

Comments

@kirxkirx
Copy link

kirxkirx commented Jul 8, 2024

Would it be possible to add support for @software bibtex records for citing codes from the Astrophysics Source Code Library (ASCL)? For example, I'm citing the ASCL record for Fermitools that I got from the ADS:

@software{2019ascl.soft05011F,
       author = {{Fermi Science Support Development Team}},
        title = "{Fermitools: Fermi Science Tools}",
 howpublished = {Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1905.011},
         year = 2019,
        month = may,
          eid = {ascl:1905.011},
       adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ascl.soft05011F},
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Unfortunately, when running on my paper source the adstex reports

Entry type software not standard. Not considered.

and ignores this record, so I have to insert it manually in the .bib file every time I re-reun adstex, which is a minor, but seemingly unnecessary inconvenience.

@yymao yymao self-assigned this Jul 8, 2024
@yymao
Copy link
Owner

yymao commented Jul 8, 2024

Thanks for the report. I am working on a fix in #43

yymao added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2024
allow nonstandard entries
@yymao yymao closed this as completed in #43 Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants