Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve integration of expander module #18

Closed
6 of 7 tasks
falkoschindler opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #74 or #85 · May be fixed by #97
Closed
6 of 7 tasks

Improve integration of expander module #18

falkoschindler opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #74 or #85 · May be fixed by #97
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@falkoschindler
Copy link
Collaborator

falkoschindler commented Nov 8, 2023

  • When instantiating an expander module, the execution should wait until the expander has sent a Ready message.
  • When instantiating a proxy module, the execution should wait until the expander has sent a first broadcast message (see Unknown Property "level" #66).
  • Later we could add constructor parameters for skipping the wait to save time when working with many expanders.
  • New methods like expander.await_ready() or proxy.await_broadcast() allow awaiting many expanders at once.
  • A new last_message_age property can be used to define safety rules that stop the machine on connection loss.
  • Expressions for reading properties need to be evaluated at runtime, not at compile time (see PR Introduce property expression to avoid evaluating properties too early #51).
  • Some kind of heart beat message should make sure a lost connection to the expander is detected.
@falkoschindler falkoschindler added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 8, 2023
@falkoschindler falkoschindler self-assigned this Nov 8, 2023
@JensOgorek JensOgorek self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@JensOgorek JensOgorek mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2024
10 tasks
@JensOgorek JensOgorek linked a pull request Sep 30, 2024 that will close this issue
10 tasks
@JensOgorek JensOgorek mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2024
5 tasks
@JensOgorek JensOgorek linked a pull request Nov 4, 2024 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@JensOgorek JensOgorek added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Nov 6, 2024
@JensOgorek JensOgorek mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2024
6 tasks
@JensOgorek JensOgorek linked a pull request Nov 18, 2024 that will close this issue
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
2 participants