-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
posix: abstract pthread_key_t as uint32_t #52313
Merged
stephanosio
merged 3 commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
from
cfriedt:use-uint32-for-pthread-key
Nov 23, 2022
Merged
posix: abstract pthread_key_t as uint32_t #52313
stephanosio
merged 3 commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
from
cfriedt:use-uint32-for-pthread-key
Nov 23, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cfriedt
requested review from
enjiamai,
stephanosio,
jeremybettis and
KangJianX
November 16, 2022 21:12
cfriedt
force-pushed
the
use-uint32-for-pthread-key
branch
from
November 16, 2022 21:13
57034dd
to
8b6b10c
Compare
Compliance failure is a false positive (pthread functions return non-negative errno values, not introducing any new types). |
cfriedt
changed the title
Use uint32 for pthread key
posix: abstract pthread_mutex_t as uint32_t
Nov 17, 2022
cfriedt
changed the title
posix: abstract pthread_mutex_t as uint32_t
posix: abstract pthread_key_t as uint32_t
Nov 17, 2022
This was referenced Nov 17, 2022
jeremybettis
previously approved these changes
Nov 18, 2022
Since this lock is only used in `pthread_once()` it makes sense to name it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Chris Friedt <cfriedt@meta.com>
None of the operations that `pthread_key_sem` protected were blocking, so simply make it a spinlock. Also made the lock static. Signed-off-by: Chris Friedt <cfriedt@meta.com>
cfriedt
force-pushed
the
use-uint32-for-pthread-key
branch
from
November 19, 2022 22:35
8b6b10c
to
9093e8e
Compare
|
Consistent with the change of `pthread_t`, `pthread_mutex_t`, and `pthread_cond_t` to `uint32_t`, we can now also abstract `pthread_key_t` as `uint32_t` and separate the implementation detail, hidden from POSIX API consumers. This change introduces `CONFIG_MAX_PTHREAD_KEY_COUNT`. Signed-off-by: Chris Friedt <cfriedt@meta.com>
cfriedt
force-pushed
the
use-uint32-for-pthread-key
branch
from
November 21, 2022 17:15
9093e8e
to
4f1f47d
Compare
|
@jeremybettis - are you OK to re-ACK? |
@enjiamai @KangJianX @keith-packard @stephanosio - would gratefully accept an approval if anyone is feeling generous 😁 |
jeremybettis
approved these changes
Nov 22, 2022
mbolivar-nordic
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2022
stephanosio
approved these changes
Nov 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
3 commits:
Please see each commit message for details.