Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix : add config check for open and closed range settings #915

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

foxspy
Copy link
Collaborator

@foxspy foxspy commented Oct 30, 2024

@sre-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: foxspy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

mergify bot commented Oct 30, 2024

@foxspy 🔍 Important: PR Classification Needed!

For efficient project management and a seamless review process, it's essential to classify your PR correctly. Here's how:

  1. If you're fixing a bug, label it as kind/bug.
  2. For small tweaks (less than 20 lines without altering any functionality), please use kind/improvement.
  3. Significant changes that don't modify existing functionalities should be tagged as kind/enhancement.
  4. Adjusting APIs or changing functionality? Go with kind/feature.

For any PR outside the kind/improvement category, ensure you link to the associated issue using the format: “issue: #”.

Thanks for your efforts and contribution to the community!.

@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ struct Entry<CFG_FLOAT> {
std::optional<CFG_FLOAT::value_type> default_val;
uint32_t type;
std::optional<std::pair<CFG_FLOAT::value_type, CFG_FLOAT::value_type>> range;
std::optional<std::pair<bool, bool>> range_included;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please consider packing range into a structure Range, which would contain all the logic, including something like bool Range::within(float value) {} and std::string Range::to_string() {} (which produces a string representation)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea~ I will apply it

@foxspy foxspy force-pushed the add_range_check_master branch 2 times, most recently from d33e629 to a088b60 Compare October 31, 2024 03:35
@zhengbuqian
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

Signed-off-by: xianliang.li <xianliang.li@zilliz.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.25%. Comparing base (3c46f4c) to head (5bf4dae).
Report is 231 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           main     #915       +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage      0   79.25%   +79.25%     
=========================================
  Files         0       81       +81     
  Lines         0     6350     +6350     
=========================================
+ Hits          0     5033     +5033     
- Misses        0     1317     +1317     

see 81 files with indirect coverage changes

@mergify mergify bot added the ci-passed label Oct 31, 2024
@zhengbuqian
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@foxspy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

foxspy commented Oct 31, 2024

/kind improvement

@sre-ci-robot sre-ci-robot merged commit e67abe7 into zilliztech:main Oct 31, 2024
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants