-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add relative indexing method proposal #889
Conversation
5f881ea
to
b431ce0
Compare
.item
method proposal
@syg @tabatkins @mathiasbynens hey, how do you think, makes it sense to add this proposal to |
31400c6
to
c9a03d7
Compare
Yes, the old proposal should not be considered at all IMHO. |
@mathiasbynens sure, in this case, |
Hm, this is indeed a risk with shipping early-stage proposals. I also think the old proposal should be removed in favor of the new one. A method named To make sure I understand the risk, |
Yep, without any additional code units / code points feature detection since I didn't think that in the future the method with this name will be added with code units semantic. I'll add it in the new patch releases, however, there are many projects where the old |
c9a03d7
to
9c07cee
Compare
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-relative-indexing-method