You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If using Failed Nodes - Remove All, the system will remove ALL sleeping nodes. This is non-intuitive and quite destructive. I would expect this command to only remove nodes which are already marked dead.
Describe the solution you'd like
The Failed Nodes - Remove All command should skip sleepy devices. I think it's ok to keep for the individual node level "Remove Failed Node" but for a network-wide operation it should skip a device that could be asleep.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A compromise could be to show a warning dialog that indicates any device that is currently asleep will be removed. However, this would mean this button is useless for anyone that has battery devices in their network.
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems unnecessary. If you call removeFailed for a single node, it is very very likely that you want to do exactly that.
The mentioned call only exists in zwavejs2mqtt, so zwavejs2mqtt should make sure that all calls make sense.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If using Failed Nodes - Remove All, the system will remove ALL sleeping nodes. This is non-intuitive and quite destructive. I would expect this command to only remove nodes which are already marked dead.
Describe the solution you'd like
The Failed Nodes - Remove All command should skip sleepy devices. I think it's ok to keep for the individual node level "Remove Failed Node" but for a network-wide operation it should skip a device that could be asleep.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A compromise could be to show a warning dialog that indicates any device that is currently asleep will be removed. However, this would mean this button is useless for anyone that has battery devices in their network.
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: